# My tuned port injection rant

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-tuned-port-injection-rant/184414>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 21, 2006, 9:06pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-tuned-port-injection-rant/184414 "2006-08-21T21:06:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 37

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2006, 8:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-tuned-port-injection-rant/184414/37 "2006-08-22T20:56:49Z")

</div>

> [@FS:Isuzu Hombre 5spd](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-isuzu-hombre-5spd/23845/14):
>
> lol, i just needed traction. finally got most of that figured out. in good weather i should be mid 13’s easy. not bad for a full weight auto car with just full exhaust on a 150K motor.
> 
> i have seen a full exhaust 5.0 stang on slicks go low 13’s as well, but it wasnt full weight like mine…and it was a stick. i know for a fact that my car with a stick and better gears would go alot quicker.
> 
> not sayin that the 5.0 aint better, it makes as much power as the 5.7 L98, its just that the stang has less weight to move and thus runs better times. motor to motor, they are pretty equal if not the 350 having advantage

full weight notch with added weight with K&N,catback no cats 154k miles and Ford 355 gears here more was in it

pure stock went 13.7 or 13.8 in his totally stock 86 5.0 with 273 gears

its always about HP vs weight but some dont realize that and think on mph means something

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-tuned-port-injection-rant/184414)._