# Nancy Palosi **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [November 8, 2006, 4:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115 "2006-11-08T16:33:24Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 5
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 9:37am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/81 "2006-11-14T09:37:38Z")
> [@Cutty"](#): > > they really shoulda picked an old fashion McDonalds big mac container… a non natural man made thing and bad for the enviornment 😃 🤣 🤣 🤣 ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/82 "2006-11-14T13:15:54Z")
> [@New to the site: introducing myself](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-to-the-site-introducing-myself/25798/14): > > why not just cut the size of goverment in half(or more) and not cut taxes? > > big goverments=bad > and those damn democrats love teh big goverment. Not only do we have a democrat controlled everything now, we also are stuck with a horrible president for the next few years. I really didn’t think it could get any worse, but it did. Historically, democrats are for bigger government. However, over the last decade the Dems have been MUCH more fiscally responsible than the GOP. ---
**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/83 "2006-11-14T13:18:42Z")
oh & buy there way… in the future when a political thread starts… people who didn’t vote…sit down & STFU. you opted to have no say. ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/84 "2006-11-14T13:18:58Z")
> [@New to the site: introducing myself](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-to-the-site-introducing-myself/25798/17): > > Marriage is a sacrament of the church. If 2 queers want to be joined, they should call it something else. > > Rome fell after they started embracing nasty shit like this. marriage is both a sacrament of the church and a legal contract. Churches, being private institutions have every right do not perform gay marriages. The state, however, cannot (or should not) discriminate. ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/85 "2006-11-14T13:20:34Z")
> [@\*\*\*\*\*\* MARCH MADNESS 07 \*\*\*\*\*\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/march-madness-07/25660/29): > > if God has nothing to do with it, why do they make u swear on a bible in court? they shouldn’t. When I was swore in at a hearing I was at they didn’t have a bible, but they made me say “the truth and nothing but the truth…so help me god.” I refused to say the “so help me god” part. The judge didn’t care. ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/86 "2006-11-14T13:21:49Z")
> [@Spec Clutch - Amazing Customer Service](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/spec-clutch-amazing-customer-service/25803/12): > > I thought Rome fell because the goverment got too powerful and wanted too much(greed), kinda like how our goverment is headed. :dunno: nope. It was all the gay sex. They were all too busy having gay sex to notice that the empire was falling. 🤣 ---
**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/87 "2006-11-14T13:23:25Z")
> [@Traded my wheels](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/traded-my-wheels/25834/34): > > they shouldn’t. When I was swore in at a hearing I was at they didn’t have a bible, but they made me say “the truth and nothing but the truth…so help me god.” > > I refused to say the “so help me god” part. The judge didn’t care. i told you all …its for fear/control…to keep you from lying. ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/88 "2006-11-14T13:23:26Z")
> [@FS or Trade: 03 R1](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-or-trade-03-r1/13489/16): > > see @ least you have a legitimate reason unlike cobra. > > I agree & don’t think gay/lesbian non-married couples should be able to collect benefits …but the reason they want to is because they are not allowed to marry > > so just let them marry & be done with it…i still don’t see a legitimate argument against the actual marriage. exactly what “benefits” can you milk the system with when you’re married? ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:25pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/89 "2006-11-14T13:25:42Z")
> [@Cutty"](#): > > just cause i think that homosexuals don’t have a leg to stand on doesn;t mean i was talking about minorities. I would never say that a persons skin color makes them less of a human being but i would say you don’t get the same rights as a married man and woman if you are a homosexual. > > heres the problem with homo’s. the outspoken faction wants it to be embraced by the masses through them constantly shoving it down our throats (no pun intended) i’m against it because of their practices. the civil rights cause was a legitamit thing but the way small groups act now is if they want it on silver platter. so its not ok to discriminate based on one’s skin color, but its perfectly alright to do so based on one’s sexual preference? Thats an awfully enlightened point of view. ---
**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/90 "2006-11-14T13:26:59Z")
> [@ATTN: AssHat in a 3g eclipse.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/attn-asshat-in-a-3g-eclipse/25841/9): > > exactly what “benefits” can you milk the system with when you’re married? i think he is saying they only want to marry for benefits… ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/91 "2006-11-14T13:30:26Z")
> [@Gym Rant v.2007](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/gym-rant-v-2007/25799/33): > > Where do you see because as my answer? I tell you what I beleive and why and you don’t and won’t ever accept so whats the point in arguing with you. Why do you want gays to marry? I’d like to here your response. Here’s my response: Because its none of my (or your) fucking business to tell them they’re NOT allowed to. They’re just as American as you or I am. Its 100% wrong to deny them the same freedoms and liberties as you or I enjoy just because they’re different from us. The only reason you’ve been able to give is because you believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman. That’s YOUR personal view. Thats great. Live your life by your beliefs. You cross the line when you want to impose your personal views on others. ---
**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/92 "2006-11-14T13:31:58Z")
> [@ATTN: AssHat in a 3g eclipse.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/attn-asshat-in-a-3g-eclipse/25841/10): > > so its not ok to discriminate based on one’s skin color, but its perfectly alright to do so based on one’s sexual preference? Thats an awfully enlightened point of view. mike…just give up…some people will never come around. he & others don’t see a comparison & never will. i was going to bring it up & go more into it but decided to give up…its useless. he saying there is no comparison & we shouldn’t conform to alow them to change society…but years ago people were sitting around having the same discussion over women voting , minorities using the same restrooms as whites, etc, etc, etc… yes it is the same thing…but some don’t see it that way. ---
**Author:** ![OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/olds_rocketman/32/5942_2.png) [@OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OLDS_ROCKETMAN)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:32pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/93 "2006-11-14T13:32:15Z")
> [@ATTN: AssHat in a 3g eclipse.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/attn-asshat-in-a-3g-eclipse/25841/10): > > so its not ok to discriminate based on one’s skin color, but its perfectly alright to do so based on one’s sexual preference? Thats an awfully enlightened point of view. who are you to pass judgemnet on my fucked up views!!! its really scary that someone as smart as you can think the way you do. ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/94 "2006-11-14T13:33:39Z")
> [@help with steel building knowledge](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/help-with-steel-building-knowledge/25807/5): > > i’m calm there was no hostility intended. but do u think we have to keep changing just to change… i don’t think the homosexual movement is making society stronger but pulling it aparts from its foundations. I don’t think that individual homos should have less rights than your average vagina/penis loving man/woman but i do think as gay couple you don’t get the rights of those who are of opposite sexes as has been tradition since the begging of the world pretty much. Its a choice that is made outside the laws of the land, keep is that way. say darkstar liked to fuck goats, and maybe he found a whole bunch of people that were the same. do we then say well you know we should really recognize these people and their marrigage to goats. NO the line is drawn at man-woman marriages and if you wanna have something outside of what is considered the law then fine but legally you will not and should not get recognized as so. thats my whole point. I don’t care what they do, i just don’t wanna see them get any legal legs under them. please explain to me how the homosexual movement is tearing society apart at its foundations. And tradition doesn’t mean shit. Traditionally, blacks and women weren’t allowed to vote. Does that make it right? ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/95 "2006-11-14T13:34:13Z")
> [@FS: Arai Quantum 2](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-arai-quantum-2/24760/14): > > i underatand your view… > at least you have a legitimate argument. not really. :hsugh: ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/96 "2006-11-14T13:34:48Z")
> [@ughhhh (///\\/\\ inside..)](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ughhhh-inside/25797/30): > > see i’m not a complete douche thats debatable. ---
**Author:** ![imported\_showtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/51bf81/32.png) [@imported\_showtime](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/imported_showtime)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/97 "2006-11-14T13:41:35Z")
> [@TV Show - Bullrun](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tv-show-bullrun/25838/5): > > please explain to me how the homosexual movement is tearing society apart at its foundations. And tradition doesn’t mean shit. Traditionally, blacks and women weren’t allowed to vote. Does that make it right? some people think like santorum… & make retarded commets. santorum said something like “same sex couples are a treat to americas families.” A THREAT?? WTF does that mean & how? there are 2 same sex households on my street (one MM & one WW)…both across the street from me…& neither of them have come over & threated my wife & I. no hostage situation, identity theft or anything. have’nt even stole my mail or trash cans. ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/98 "2006-11-14T13:41:53Z")
> [@where to intern](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/where-to-intern/25771/19): > > I think a lot of people are forgetting that Marriage is a sacrament of the church. Why are queers so eager to be “married” ? If you don’t belong to, or agree with the church, why do you want to be married? Cutty already covered it, it’s just about benefits, and sticking it to the rest of us. See, there’s your fault. You see them as something other than “the rest of us” They’re just as much a human being/American as you. Therefore, they’re entitled to the same benefits as you. And for the LAST FUCKING TIME, marriage, in the eyes of the state, has NOTHING to do with religion. Its a legal contract. Nothing more. > The fact is, that they are not the norm, and they are not capable of reproducing, (which in itself disproves evolution). That being said, they should not be outcasts from society, but at the same time we shouldn’t bend over backwards to make them “fit in.” Holy fucking shit. This may be the dumbest comment I’ve read on Pittspeed that wasn’t posted by Cutty or Quik. Its not even worth responding to, so instead I’ll take a second to just laugh at how woefully ignorant you are. > Think a little further down the road, if they get married, then they can start adopting children. How screwed up is that kid going to be? Is it right to put a kid in a home with 2 queer parents? A kid that has had a rough beginning as it is, now he gets beat up because some homos adopted him. It’s bigger than just “letting them get married.” Who are you to say that a kid is going to be screwed up because he has gay parents? Who’s to say that a kid growing up with two loving gay parents will be more screwed up than a kid growing with traditional parents? 🤣 You’re really racking up the ignorance points. ---
**Author:** ![Darkstar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@Darkstar](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Darkstar)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/99 "2006-11-14T13:43:50Z")
> [@Cutty"](#): > > because they want a good rep, they took the word gay which means happy. they also took the rainbow, something of which is a beautiful natural phenomenon. they picked those to appear as if being homosexual is a good natural thing. they really shoulda picked an old fashion McDonalds big mac container… a non natural man made thing and bad for the enviornment 😃 yeah, Im sure there was a big homosexual conclave in which they decided amongst themselves to adopt “happy” symbols and nomenclature so as to make them appear to have a “good rep” ---
**Author:** ![OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/olds_rocketman/32/5942_2.png) [@OLDS\_ROCKETMAN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/OLDS_ROCKETMAN)\ **Post date:** [November 14, 2006, 1:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115/100 "2006-11-14T13:44:09Z")
> [@TV Show - Bullrun](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/tv-show-bullrun/25838/5): > > please explain to me how the homosexual movement is tearing society apart at its foundations. And tradition doesn’t mean shit. Traditionally, blacks and women weren’t allowed to vote. Does that make it right? i’m not gonna argue with u cause your always right due to to your incredible brain powers. I mean i forgot about ur Phd from the university of the Internet, pittspeed campus. [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115.md?page=4) [Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nancy-palosi/186115.md?page=6)