# Neil or kordell **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [January 5, 2007, 8:20am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/neil-or-kordell/187231 "2007-01-05T08:20:10Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 42
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [January 9, 2007, 9:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/neil-or-kordell/187231/42 "2007-01-09T09:47:08Z")
> [@Any stereo advantage connections?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/any-stereo-advantage-connections/26913/10): > > my point… neil was more likey not to lose a game but less likely to able to win you a game. if neil didn;t have a great defense, steallar o-line and very good rb’s he would have seriously struggled. Neil was the jim mcmahon of the 85 bears…the weakest link. had the bears had a better QB that team may win 3 SB’s instead of just the won. same can be said with the steelers, Say maybe they had a Jim kelly, a warren moon…they win. Had Marino decided to leave miami like the steelers hoped in the early 90’s …they fucken destroy who ever they play. I somewhat see your point, but in the end neil\>Kordell…Kordell would find a way to lose you games. Kordell should have stuck with his roll as “slash” He was not an NFL QB by all means. And for a side not he loved a hot mancock in his mouth --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/neil-or-kordell/187231)._