# Networking Guru's..question for you.

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/networking-gurus-question-for-you/187898>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [February 7, 2007, 3:48pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/networking-gurus-question-for-you/187898 "2007-02-07T15:48:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JackdUp](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jackdup/32/6015_2.png) [@JackdUp](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JackdUp)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2007, 4:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/networking-gurus-question-for-you/187898/21 "2007-02-08T16:17:37Z")

</div>

bits, sorry replace KB with Kb. I’m hungry and can’t think straight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fshowcars](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fshowcars/32/5937_2.png) [@fshowcars](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fshowcars)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2007, 6:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/networking-gurus-question-for-you/187898/22 "2007-02-09T06:04:10Z")

</div>

> [@JackdUp"](#):
>
> Actually, using bandwidth and traffic shaping, multi-homed systems with 768 and 1222 Kb/s connections, respectively, are theoretically able to do about 1600 Kb/s when properly routing and distributing packets if I remember how to do the math correctly.

if you multi you could get that high, figure you have 16 channels… but if it’s a point to point (isdn) you can pptp or ipsec and with the overhead have a little less through but be secure…

again… completely pointless for home use…

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/networking-gurus-question-for-you/187898.md?page=1)