# New cars VS old

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-cars-vs-old/262148
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive
**Created:** [January 4, 2012, 9:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-cars-vs-old/262148 "2012-01-04T09:50:32Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 60

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)
#### Post date: [January 4, 2012, 8:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-cars-vs-old/262148/60 "2012-01-04T20:12:50Z")

</div>

> [@FS 2000 DAKOTA RC R/T 5.9L lower price!!!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-2000-dakota-rc-r-t-5-9l-lower-price/42873/54):
>
> This ain’t too bad. But the Camaro of the mid-90’s-prior to current model (to the right in that image - and the even older one above it) or whatever? Looks like complete ass compared to the two above. I don’t know WTF Chevy was thinking…but IMO they made that car HIDEOUS for a LONG ass time.

mid 90’s shared 2 different styles…they really shouldnt have both been 4th gen’s.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-cars-vs-old/262148)._