# New Challenger? **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [November 21, 2005, 4:29pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851 "2005-11-21T16:29:49Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![STEALTTH](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/stealtth/32/7582_2.png) [@STEALTTH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/STEALTTH)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2005, 8:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/21 "2005-11-21T20:39:20Z")
kinda makes you wonder why they didn’t make it that way doesn’t it? Thats the reason why i don’t fully like them. The look was there and they copped out. I mean the chargers look good…but not like they could. ---
**Author:** ![9ONA3OOZX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/9ona3oozx/32/7242_2.png) [@9ONA3OOZX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/9ONA3OOZX)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2005, 9:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/22 "2005-11-21T21:05:19Z")
> [@neurokinetik](#): > > I actually like the new Charger… :gotme: you mean charger/magnum/300C… i dont think a car company deserves credit or bragging rights for releasing three different versions of the same car…praise them once maybe for releasing the first and only ever cool station wagon, but the other two are the same, just not as unique or cool… just my .02 ---
**Author:** ![MonteCarloChick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ee59a6/32.png) [@MonteCarloChick](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MonteCarloChick)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2005, 9:06pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/23 "2005-11-21T21:06:53Z")
> [@90NA300ZX](#): > > you mean charger/magnum/300C… > > i dont think a car company deserves credit or bragging rights for releasing three different versions of the same car…praise them once maybe for releasing the first and only ever cool station wagon, but the other two are the same, just not as unique or cool… > > just my .02 It’s like that with a lot of car companies nowadays though. No originality. ---
**Author:** ![BaD\_AZz\_Z\_28](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/f04885/32.png) [@BaD\_AZz\_Z\_28](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BaD_AZz_Z_28)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2005, 10:51pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/24 "2005-11-21T22:51:31Z")
Charger would be OK if it wasnt named charger. You cant take the most strikingly beautiful car in history and do that to it. This challenger would be a welcome distraction from that look (4 door, high beltline, boxy). Its a great look for a 300, but not for charger/challenger ---
**Author:** ![Fetter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c2a13f/32.png) [@Fetter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Fetter)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2005, 10:54pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/25 "2005-11-21T22:54:31Z")
> [@MonteCarloChick](#): > > It’s like that with a lot of car companies nowadays though. No originality. :word: ---
**Author:** ![bladez](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bladez/32/7237_2.png) [@bladez](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bladez)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2005, 10:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/26 "2005-11-21T22:58:04Z")
wow, if they actually make the new challenger :tup: to dodge. i like that sema charger…i wish they would make the hemi version of hte charger a 2door and keep the other models the 4 door to help tell them apart ---
**Author:** ![TrueBlue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/trueblue/32/7245_2.png) [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 5:16am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/27 "2005-11-22T05:16:56Z")
fucking dodge, making me rethink my car buying future… _dayum_ that looks incredible. ---
**Author:** ![DSMigraine](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f1d935/32.png) [@DSMigraine](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/DSMigraine)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 6:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/28 "2005-11-22T06:03:19Z")
:tup: very impressive. I like that challenger much better than the new charger ---
**Author:** ![jeeves744](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jeeves744/32/7619_2.png) [@jeeves744](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/jeeves744)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 6:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/29 "2005-11-22T06:23:32Z")
> [@BaD AZz Z/28](#): > > Charger would be OK if it wasnt named charger. You cant take the most strikingly beautiful car in history and do that to it. This challenger would be a welcome distraction from that look (4 door, high beltline, boxy). Its a great look for a 300, but not for charger/challenger same thing with the GTO, would have been better if it didnt have the GTO name. Hopefullly Chevy wont fuck up the new camaro ---
**Author:** ![newman](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/newman/32/7569_2.png) [@newman](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/newman)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 6:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/30 "2005-11-22T06:31:08Z")
hot. ---
**Author:** ![Juan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a698b9/32.png) [@Juan](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Juan)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 6:32am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/31 "2005-11-22T06:32:13Z")
:tup: I like it alot ---
**Author:** ![psphinx81](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/e9a140/32.png) [@psphinx81](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/psphinx81)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 6:37am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/32 "2005-11-22T06:37:40Z")
awesome :tup: ---
**Author:** ![audios](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c4cdca/32.png) [@audios](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/audios)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 6:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/33 "2005-11-22T06:41:58Z")
i dont think thats real (as in real for dodge, not p-chop). looks like a chip foose sort of thing. as a matter of fact that dude in the pic looks kind of like foose. anyways car companies are too dumb to build cars this nice…gasp if they actually took a well recieved concept and brought it to production. yeah yeah i know, costs of production blah blah blah. ford did it with the thunderbird and it got car of the year:smash2: (which i totally disagreed with) ---
**Author:** ![JaysGreenLX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jaysgreenlx/32/7321_2.png) [@JaysGreenLX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JaysGreenLX)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 7:02am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/34 "2005-11-22T07:02:21Z")
> [@neurokinetik](#): > > I actually like the new Charger… :gotme: -1 I think its teh gheyness The Challenger looks cool, but where is the originality? I hate this retro shit. Make something new but just put some of the styling cues from the original. Don’t make a modernized version of the same car. ---
**Author:** ![articzap](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/articzap/32/7361_2.png) [@articzap](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/articzap)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 7:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/35 "2005-11-22T07:45:17Z")
> [@jeeves744](#): > > same thing with the GTO, would have been better if it didnt have the GTO name. Hopefullly Chevy wont fuck up the new camaro thats bs. the first gto was based off of a decent selling line with a bad ass motor in it. what chevy did was make a gto that lived up to its name. its based off of another carline with an ls2 in it. i mean that car is badass, a true msucle car. ---
**Author:** ![JaysGreenLX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jaysgreenlx/32/7321_2.png) [@JaysGreenLX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JaysGreenLX)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 8:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/36 "2005-11-22T08:04:06Z")
> [@articzap](#): > > what chevy did was make a gto that lived up to its name. GTO is gay ---
**Author:** ![TrueBlue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/trueblue/32/7245_2.png) [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 8:11am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/37 "2005-11-22T08:11:26Z")
> [@articzap](#): > > thats bs. the first gto was based off of a decent selling line with a bad ass motor in it. what chevy did was make a gto that lived up to its name. its based off of another carline with an ls2 in it. i mean that car is badass, a true msucle car. 'tis true. the new goat follows the old goat’s philosophy pretty closely - midsize car with a big motor in it, nothing showy. still the cheapest 400bhp you can buy new. ---
**Author:** ![Blown\_Stroked](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blown_stroked/32/7324_2.png) [@Blown\_Stroked](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Blown_Stroked)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 8:18am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/38 "2005-11-22T08:18:43Z")
The challenger is nice but i think the camaro will be alot hotter ![http://www.lateral-g.net/forums/attachment.php4?attachmentid=1416](http://www.lateral-g.net/forums/attachment.php4?attachmentid=1416) ---
**Author:** ![articzap](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/articzap/32/7361_2.png) [@articzap](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/articzap)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 8:33am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/39 "2005-11-22T08:33:15Z")
there is no actual facts sayin the camaro is coming back last time i checked. and if it does, it better not look like a 1st gen cause that would just ruin the camaro heritage and name. they need something new for it to be good. ---
**Author:** ![RedGoober4Life](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redgoober4life/32/7610_2.png) [@RedGoober4Life](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RedGoober4Life)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2005, 8:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851/40 "2005-11-22T08:44:39Z")
Lets move forward, America. [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851.md?page=1) [Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-challenger/4851.md?page=3)