# New GTR

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-gtr/143866>\
**Category:** Canada Nissan Automotive\
**Created:** [August 18, 2006, 2:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-gtr/143866 "2006-08-18T14:19:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fcukven1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c2a13f/32.png) [@fcukven1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fcukven1)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2006, 2:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-gtr/143866/1 "2006-08-18T14:19:02Z")

</div>

some punk kid with alot of time on his hand came up with this … in his little world he though if nissan was to come up with a R35, it would look like this … well lets just say that i wish i was in his world cause i think this CAR is HOT but thats just what i think

![http://img483.imageshack.us/img483/4387/06010918054660dv4.jpg](http://img483.imageshack.us/img483/4387/06010918054660dv4.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JVD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@JVD](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JVD)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2006, 2:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-gtr/143866/2 "2006-08-18T14:24:25Z")

</div>

I’m pretty sure the original(top left) was a photoshop. I remember the name from when I used to browse those forums. The big picture would take no skill at all. I think that iacoski probably airbrushed a lot of the car from scratch. If it is actually the guy I’m thinking of…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fcukven1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c2a13f/32.png) [@fcukven1](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fcukven1)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2006, 2:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-gtr/143866/3 "2006-08-18T14:35:32Z")

</div>

oh im not saying that this IS the new GTR … the whole thing was photoshoped i just think that this desgin is a lot better than the one that we are actually getting … if you notice at least this kept the lines from his ancestor but with a more agressive look and didnt ruin it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JVD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@JVD](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JVD)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2006, 2:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-gtr/143866/4 "2006-08-18T14:43:04Z")

</div>

> [@fcukven1](#):
>
> oh im not saying that this IS the new GTR … the whole thing was photoshoped i just think that this desgin is a lot better than the one that we are actually getting … if you notice at least this kept the lines from his ancestor but with a more agressive look and didnt ruin it

I know this isn’t the new GTR, it’s just that you should have posted the original, and not the cheesy photoshopped version. And I agree, this design is hot, hot, hot.

EDIT: [http://acn.waw.pl/iacoski/index.html](http://acn.waw.pl/iacoski/index.html) \<\<\< Credit should be given to where it is due. Some n00b basically hacked up a cool design.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![disco\_240sx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b782af/32.png) [@disco\_240sx](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/disco_240sx)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2006, 12:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-gtr/143866/5 "2006-08-20T12:42:07Z")

</div>

the new supra should have looked like this [http://acn.waw.pl/iacoski/EN/foto\_4.html](http://acn.waw.pl/iacoski/EN/foto_4.html)  
people are getting to far ahead of our time bring back old school  
not like this [http://acn.waw.pl/iacoski/EN/foto\_2.html](http://acn.waw.pl/iacoski/EN/foto_2.html)