# new mustang = twin turbo? **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [January 25, 2008, 7:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-mustang-twin-turbo/42412 "2008-01-25T07:55:01Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![reliant\_turbo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/reliant_turbo/32/7189_2.png) [@reliant\_turbo](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/reliant_turbo)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2008, 7:56am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-mustang-twin-turbo/42412/21 "2008-01-26T07:56:28Z")
i wonder how strong the turbo6 engine will be… i can see it being pretty easy to have a 450hp v6 mustang if the engine is beefy enough. i could care less if the mustang has a twin turbo 6 over a v8. i like my money to be burnt less fast out the tailpipe. 🙂 Brian ---
**Author:** ![Jack](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jack/32/7613_2.png) [@Jack](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jack)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2008, 8:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-mustang-twin-turbo/42412/22 "2008-01-26T08:19:38Z")
lol… you’re talking about a company who is hardly getting that out of their refined V8 with a blower on it. I’m guessing they will put 5psi to a V6 and get 3-350 out of it and call it a day. ---
**Author:** ![JaysGreenLX](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jaysgreenlx/32/7321_2.png) [@JaysGreenLX](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JaysGreenLX)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2008, 8:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-mustang-twin-turbo/42412/23 "2008-01-26T08:22:11Z")
> [@somedude](#): > > actually they are bringing back the 302 pushrod setup in certain models I like that. ---
**Author:** ![TrueBlue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/trueblue/32/7245_2.png) [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2008, 9:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-mustang-twin-turbo/42412/24 "2008-01-26T09:19:57Z")
> [@MikeRi24](#): > > IMO, the day Ford stops putting a V8 in the Mustang, they might as well just re-name the car cuz it aint a Mustang anymore. Well, that day was sometime back in 1974. Irrelevant anyway… > Traditionalists need not worry, though - V-8s will still be very much part of the Mustang program for 2010. More powertrain options is good. Now let’s see an optional IRS setup. ---
**Author:** ![Deathproof](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/dec6dc/32.png) [@Deathproof](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Deathproof)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2008, 10:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-mustang-twin-turbo/42412/25 "2008-01-26T10:53:06Z")
They have a 5.0 but it isn’t pushrod, it’s ohc, it’s in the parnelli jones, and certain saleen models and even the steeda mustangs(which are awesome and no one knows about them) plus ford has had a 5.0 crate “cammer” DOHC motor for quite a few years. ---
**Author:** ![NYstanger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/6a8cbe/32.png) [@NYstanger](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/NYstanger)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2008, 11:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-mustang-twin-turbo/42412/26 "2008-01-26T11:12:14Z")
> [@deathproof001](#): > > They have a 5.0 but it isn’t pushrod, it’s ohc, it’s in the parnelli jones, and certain saleen models and even the steeda mustangs(which are awesome and no one knows about them) plus ford has had a 5.0 crate “cammer” DOHC motor for quite a few years. Excatly. Ford has been moving forward with the modular engine. No way they would go and recreate a push rod motor. Like stated there are already a couple 302 cubic inch displaced modular mustangs. Ford even just introduced a new mod 302 block for purchase capable of withstanding 1200 hp. [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-mustang-twin-turbo/42412.md?page=1)