# New Toy

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-toy/203251>\
**Category:** Builds\
**Created:** [July 22, 2009, 10:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-toy/203251 "2009-07-22T22:37:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 77

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SoLow](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/solow/32/6001_2.png) [@SoLow](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SoLow)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2009, 9:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-toy/203251/77 "2009-09-15T09:51:46Z")

</div>

quik ur truck made how much power & u only ran a 12 sec pass :rolleyes:

> [@Wedding DJ](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wedding-dj/41105/3):
>
> well lets see…
> 
> 99% of that extra weight is rotating mass from the wheels since the new camaro needs bling and you can’t get it with a lighter 16" wheel.
> 
> the tires are a ridiculous 28.7" tall compared to the 4th gen’s 25.7"
> 
> and then let’s factor in the new camaro’s drivetrain. Yes the motor has about 100 more hp/tq than the good ole LS1, but compare what both cars are typically dyno’ing at. All that new/heavy drivetrain and IRS soaks up a lot of HP, and the end result is there being only a ~50-60 hp difference between the two. So you basically have an extra 50-60 rwhp to make up for that 300 lbs, not 100.
> 
> Don’t even get me started on the stupid IRS crap
> 
> There’s a guy on ls1tech that is setting all the 2010 camaro records, and when he was headers/tune only, he was trapping about 112 mph @ a 2000 DA(seems about on par with BoostedYards86’s). I think he has now ended up running like 11.8 @ 116 with bolt ons, tune, and using 18’s.
> 
> So there are your reasons why the new camaro is blowing the doors off of the 4th gen f-bodies.
> 
> /ricer math  
> /bench racing

quik JR:blah:

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-toy/203251)._