# Next EcoBoost candidate

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [April 27, 2011, 7:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783 "2011-04-27T19:15:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![POOPRA](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/poopra/32/7188_2.png) [@POOPRA](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/POOPRA)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 8:23am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/21 "2011-04-29T08:23:37Z")

</div>

They make a 4 cyinder 247 HP ecoboost

Read the article referenced in the first post

“Ford current Ecoboost 4-cylinder is capable of up to 247 horsepower”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![piratemosh666](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/piratemosh666/32/6116_2.png) [@piratemosh666](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/piratemosh666)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 8:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/22 "2011-04-29T08:35:12Z")

</div>

Which is not in production yet, and the only production possibility as of RIGHT NOW would be in the new Focus. I can assure you it will not make that much power in the Focus either…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KuntryQuestTSi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kuntryquesttsi/32/5010_2.png) [@KuntryQuestTSi](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/KuntryQuestTSi)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 8:51am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/23 "2011-04-29T08:51:05Z")

</div>

> [@POOPRA](#):
>
> They make a 4 cyinder 247 HP ecoboost
> 
> Read the article referenced in the first post
> 
> “Ford current Ecoboost 4-cylinder is capable of up to 247 horsepower”

> [@POOPRA](#):
>
> Ford does not make a 300HP 4 cyl ecoboost
> 
> The 300HP NA v6 makes 280lb/ft of torque, the 247HP ecoboost makes 266lb/ft.
> 
> I doubt there would be much MPG difference either since the V6 already gets 31 MPG.

…

Seemed like you where refering to the V6 ecoboost.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NYstanger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/6a8cbe/32.png) [@NYstanger](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/NYstanger)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 8:59am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/24 "2011-04-29T08:59:07Z")

</div>

It be hard to picture a svo variant with a eco boost 4 cyl with how much heavier this platform is

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![POOPRA](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/poopra/32/7188_2.png) [@POOPRA](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/POOPRA)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 9:28am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/25 "2011-04-29T09:28:45Z")

</div>

> [@piratemosh666](#):
>
> Which is not in production yet, and the only production possibility as of RIGHT NOW would be in the new Focus. I can assure you it will not make that much power in the Focus either…

It will make the same amount of power whatever car it is in

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![theblue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/theblue/32/5074_2.png) [@theblue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/theblue)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 9:30am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/26 "2011-04-29T09:30:11Z")

</div>

lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KuntryQuestTSi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kuntryquesttsi/32/5010_2.png) [@KuntryQuestTSi](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/KuntryQuestTSi)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 9:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/27 "2011-04-29T09:44:14Z")

</div>

> [@POOPRA](#):
>
> It will make the same amount of power whatever car it is in

Those numbers can change.  
They may de tune it for the focus. IF it even happens

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 9:49am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/28 "2011-04-29T09:49:36Z")

</div>

how much boost are they running through it to make 247hp?

I think it would be REALLY hard to have a turbo charged 4-cylinder engine getting over 30mpg running with 300hp. You’re looking at boost at least in the 15 psi range. Also, OEM’s almost always heir on the side of caution and run the cars a little richer than most tuners would choose. If a tuner leaned it out, you MIGHT get there. I just don’t think it’s likely.

Mid-20’s would be more likely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KuntryQuestTSi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kuntryquesttsi/32/5010_2.png) [@KuntryQuestTSi](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/KuntryQuestTSi)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 9:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/29 "2011-04-29T09:53:40Z")

</div>

The 3.5 are running 12psi now

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![theblue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/theblue/32/5074_2.png) [@theblue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/theblue)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 9:56am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/30 "2011-04-29T09:56:23Z")

</div>

I got 30mpg today average on my 25 mile highway commute in the A3 which has ~ 270 crank. It’s direct inject but doesn’t have too many other modern tricks like variable cams or manifolds. On days that I really flog it I can get it down to 26-27mpg.

I think it can be done from the factory with more technology thrown in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 10:02am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/31 "2011-04-29T10:02:00Z")

</div>

EPA estimates say that the 2010 a3 gets 22/28 with 24 combined

you have a handful of mods too, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![theblue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/theblue/32/5074_2.png) [@theblue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/theblue)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 10:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/32 "2011-04-29T10:04:31Z")

</div>

I just have a larger catless downpipe and APR stage II software. So I’m basically getting those stock numbers but with a bunch more power.

The large point being that a slightly better generation of direct inject motors should easily get 30mph highway with 300hp

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boardjnky4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/96bed5/32.png) [@boardjnky4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/boardjnky4)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 10:07am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/33 "2011-04-29T10:07:18Z")

</div>

word, so you’re probably running a bit leaner than factory car would be.

I’m not saying it isn’t possible, but I think it’s unlikely for a 4 cylinder turbo to do 300hp or more and still get 30mpg CONSISTENTLY.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![piratemosh666](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/piratemosh666/32/6116_2.png) [@piratemosh666](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/piratemosh666)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 10:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/34 "2011-04-29T10:41:14Z")

</div>

> [@KuntryQuestTSi](#):
>
> Those numbers can change.  
> They may de tune it for the focus. IF it even happens

This.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TrueBlue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/trueblue/32/7245_2.png) [@TrueBlue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TrueBlue)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 10:45am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/35 "2011-04-29T10:45:50Z")

</div>

> [@boardjnky4](#):
>
> I think it’s unlikely for a 4 cylinder turbo to do 300hp or more and still get 30mpg CONSISTENTLY.

And keep in mind that the _current_ 3.7L N/A V6 that already comes in the base cars is 300 horse / 31 MPG. It will likely be the 3.5L six.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Minglor](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/minglor/32/7373_2.png) [@Minglor](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Minglor)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2011, 6:06am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/36 "2011-04-30T06:06:11Z")

</div>

> [@theblue](#):
>
> I got 30mpg today average on my 25 mile highway commute in the A3 which has ~ 270 crank. It’s direct inject but doesn’t have too many other modern tricks like variable cams or manifolds. On days that I really flog it I can get it down to 26-27mpg.
> 
> I think it can be done from the factory with more technology thrown in.

My 2.0t a4 would get 30-32 if I took it easy. was tuned tho.

I would like to see an ecoboost focus

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![piratemosh666](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/piratemosh666/32/6116_2.png) [@piratemosh666](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/piratemosh666)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2011, 7:06am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/37 "2011-04-30T07:06:30Z")

</div>

I would like to see an ecoboost focus[/QUOTE]

This. It would be nice, but we never seem to get the really cool stuff that Europe already has. Like the sick nasty Focus FR500 with a Volvo turbo 5cyl. and flat black paint treatment that makes around 300hp…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![somedude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecd19e/32.png) [@somedude](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/somedude)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2011, 9:01pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/38 "2011-04-30T21:01:03Z")

</div>

I thought the ecoboost focus got the green light for production already? I know the ecoboost 4cyl is already confirmed for the 2013 taurus. They claim 30mpg on that boat and that is a 4300 battleship

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![08GT500](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/08gt500/32/5417_2.png) [@08GT500](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/08GT500)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2011, 9:28pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/39 "2011-04-30T21:28:51Z")

</div>

I’ll take a twin turbo 5.0 in the stang.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![piratemosh666](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/piratemosh666/32/6116_2.png) [@piratemosh666](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/piratemosh666)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2011, 6:57am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783/40 "2011-05-01T06:57:09Z")

</div>

> [@somedude](#):
>
> I thought the ecoboost focus got the green light for production already? I know the ecoboost 4cyl is already confirmed for the 2013 taurus. They claim 30mpg on that boat and that is a 4300 battleship

I know they are considering an Ecoboost 4pot for the Explorer believe it or not and had heard something about them using it in the Taurus, but I haven’t seen any official news as of yet on the Focus getting the green light. I haven’t looked very hard though.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/next-ecoboost-candidate/211783.md?page=3)
