# No More Birth Control?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/no-more-birth-control/51665>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [July 17, 2008, 2:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/no-more-birth-control/51665 "2008-07-17T14:05:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Stevil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dr.Stevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dr.Stevil)\
**Post date:** [July 17, 2008, 2:24pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/no-more-birth-control/51665/9 "2008-07-17T14:24:26Z")

</div>

now, I firmly believe in a womans right to choose, but does this really make sense to anyone?

> Congressional Democrats are criticizing the Bush administration for a draft proposal they say would change the definition of abortion and limit women’s access to contraception.  
> Senate bill/Abortion debate  
> Democrats on Capitol Hill argue proposed changes by the Bush administration would limit access to contraception and abortion.
> 
> The draft proposal from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which began circulating around Capitol Hill earlier this week, would withhold government funds from health-care providers and organizations that don’t hire people who refuse to perform abortions or provide certain types of birth control.

now, does the draft state those words? Or is this their take on what it means? It seems more like something to stir the pot than anything else, but who knows. (at least in contrast to the first sentence)

So are they saying that birth control is unconstitutional or some shit? lol Would have to actually read the bill I guess (but going to enjoy the weather instead, knock a broad up and then push her down a flight of stairs)

ftw :tup:

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/no-more-birth-control/51665)._