# No more SS Cobalt..

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/no-more-ss-cobalt/190456
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [June 11, 2007, 10:04am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/no-more-ss-cobalt/190456 "2007-06-11T10:04:41Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 26

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![brk\_05](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e47c2d/32.png) [@brk\_05](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/brk_05)
#### Post date: [June 13, 2007, 10:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/no-more-ss-cobalt/190456/26 "2007-06-13T10:39:52Z")

</div>

> [@I \<3 Mandi](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-3-mandi/30584/646):
>
> but you do realize the stock eaton has a parasitic loss on the engine when it is compressing the air right? the turbocharger on the other hand does not, which in return is greater efficiency.
> 
> the 2.0SC engine is using HP to make HP  
> the 2.0TC engine is not using any of its power to make HP in return its using its wasted exhaust gases to spin the compressor
> 
> and after talking to a friend who works closely with GM. it’s no secret, the 2.0Turbo LDK engine is a go for 2009 Cobalts

I am not arguing against the turbo in any way. Just making a point about the engines in their stock form. I agree that the cobalts will be going turbo for '09.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/no-more-ss-cobalt/190456)._