# Norton Antivirus 2005 Corporate - any good?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [September 14, 2005, 5:54am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027 "2005-09-14T05:54:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HaNnIBaL64](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hannibal64/32/5954_2.png) [@HaNnIBaL64](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HaNnIBaL64)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 5:54am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/1 "2005-09-14T05:54:18Z")

</div>

Is it? Ive had 2005 noncorporate and i liked it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 5:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/2 "2005-09-14T05:55:40Z")

</div>

I use norton corporate here at work. It’s not bad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HaNnIBaL64](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hannibal64/32/5954_2.png) [@HaNnIBaL64](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HaNnIBaL64)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 6:00am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/3 "2005-09-14T06:00:57Z")

</div>

cool

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 6:15am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/4 "2005-09-14T06:15:01Z")

</div>

> [@77rednecktruck](#):
>
> I use norton corporate here at work. It’s not bad.

so do we. no problems here

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JackdUp](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jackdup/32/6015_2.png) [@JackdUp](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JackdUp)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 6:28am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/5 "2005-09-14T06:28:52Z")

</div>

I find Norton suites to be _brutally_ effective. Sometimes, too much so.

Keep in mind that legitimate programs that require the commonly abused runtime components of worm/virus-like features to run (jscript/vbscript scripting of FSO, winsock/port access, etc.) don’t work when IT policy makers are draconian/inflexible in their decisions and set all settings to maximum/auto clean/etc. without the possibility of any exceptions to the rule _for the sake of “security”_. Blanket policy is bad policy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fshowcars](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fshowcars/32/5937_2.png) [@fshowcars](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fshowcars)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 6:54am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/6 "2005-09-14T06:54:20Z")

</div>

what product are you talking about?

anti-spyware 2005

or corporate 9.x?

i use 9.x and client security 2.0

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JackdUp](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jackdup/32/6015_2.png) [@JackdUp](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JackdUp)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 7:15am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/7 "2005-09-14T07:15:55Z")

</div>

I don’t remember the exact product name, but it would be “enterprise” or something. It had everything. There was about half a dozen or more NAV related processes running with an equal number of symantec’s control panel options, like firewall, worm blocker, script blocker, anti-virus, etc. It was definitely a “corporate” thing.

[http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/content/productlink.cfm?EID=0](http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/content/productlink.cfm?EID=0)

IIRC, it was that group of stuff on the left, _enterprise security technology_ with all the bells and whistles installed, turned on and no exceptions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fshowcars](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fshowcars/32/5937_2.png) [@fshowcars](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/fshowcars)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 7:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/8 "2005-09-14T07:24:12Z")

</div>

those are install snap-ins for the corporate 9.x admin console… that’s what i use.

i was more specifically speaking to hannibal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HaNnIBaL64](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hannibal64/32/5954_2.png) [@HaNnIBaL64](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HaNnIBaL64)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 7:48pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/9 "2005-09-14T19:48:46Z")

</div>

this is what i have if it helps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2005, 8:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/norton-antivirus-2005-corporate-any-good/177027/10 "2005-09-14T20:04:51Z")

</div>

yup. thats what i have at work
