# NU-B question.. Very simple

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nu-b-question-very-simple/113812>\
**Category:** SON240sx Automotive\
**Created:** [March 12, 2008, 7:47am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nu-b-question-very-simple/113812 "2008-03-12T07:47:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nd4boost](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/nd4boost/32/5627_2.png) [@nd4boost](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/nd4boost)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2008, 8:48am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nu-b-question-very-simple/113812/20 "2008-03-22T08:48:49Z")

</div>

> [@so i found a dog...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/so-i-found-a-dog/16343/37):
>
> Don’t you think your interpretation of “performance” is rather narrow minded?
> 
> if you compared the two fuels side by side in similar cars, and one drove farther than the other…its pretty obvious that performance is being measured by mileage…
> 
> if you compared the two fuels side by side in similar engines over the course of a life time (exaggerated example)… for the sake of comparing which fuel preserved the integrity of fuel related components… again, I think it’s clear that performance is being measured by conservation and not “go faster” factor.
> 
> performance can be measured by many things… and since most of the above discussion was centered around fuel mileage and saving a buck or two for the daily driver…I’m not sure why you assumed this was all about going faster.

you are right in that respect but the whole point of my original post was to gt champion who said “i felt a big difference in the performance and the get up and go of the car…but thats just me…always used it since”  
and i wanted to explain that a higher octaine will not give you a better get up and go as he put it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nu-b-question-very-simple/113812)._
