# NYSpeed Time-Attack @ Dunnville

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nyspeed-time-attack-dunnville/16636>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [August 28, 2006, 11:51pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nyspeed-time-attack-dunnville/16636 "2006-08-28T23:51:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 82

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gsx](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/gsx/32/7277_2.png) [@gsx](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/gsx)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2006, 9:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nyspeed-time-attack-dunnville/16636/82 "2006-08-30T09:24:19Z")

</div>

> [@EvoMR](#):
>
> If you work out a GB price, I will definitely pick up a full system. I’m not sure how the systems work, but would it be possible to run multiple cars at a time. Even if you are running just 3 cars at a time on a 1.x mile course there should be plenty of spacing over 10 minutes as long as the car/driver are reasonably well matched. I’m not sure if the transponder is tripped by every passing vehicle or by each specific signal but even at 2 cars per session, then half of the time could be spent more like a track day and then the second half could be the time trial= more track time for everyone and time trial and still done by dark.

yea 2 cars would be better but they want transponders and such for acurately timed runs so no bickering happens…which i can understand…there trying to go for a time attack atmosphere but time attack gets a whole weekend of track time…i say we have another regular track day and then have a time attack when we can get the track for the whole day…

as of right now im spectating and not participating…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nyspeed-time-attack-dunnville/16636)._
