# Oh no, no need for congressional oversight

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oh-no-no-need-for-congressional-oversight/12165
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [May 17, 2006, 12:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oh-no-no-need-for-congressional-oversight/12165 "2006-05-17T12:39:05Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JayS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jays/32/15375_2.png) [@JayS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JayS)
#### Post date: [May 17, 2006, 6:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oh-no-no-need-for-congressional-oversight/12165/14 "2006-05-17T18:34:22Z")

</div>

Well, you can read the whole thing here:

[http://www.washingtonwatchdog.org/documents/usc/ttl15/ch2B/sec78m.html](http://www.washingtonwatchdog.org/documents/usc/ttl15/ch2B/sec78m.html)

But I’ve been writing code for 8 hours at my regular job, plus 3 hours tonight doing my consulting gig, so there is no way I’m shifting my brain into lawyer mode to decipher that.

EDIT:  
Joe, you may want to check your source. Note the date at the top of that link…  
**_U.S. Code as of: 01/26/1998_**  
  
Looks like this might be the work of your hero Clinton.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oh-no-no-need-for-congressional-oversight/12165)._