# Old muscle cars vs new ones

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/old-muscle-cars-vs-new-ones/173465>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [April 5, 2005, 9:43am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/old-muscle-cars-vs-new-ones/173465 "2005-04-05T09:43:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HaNnIBaL64](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hannibal64/32/5954_2.png) [@HaNnIBaL64](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HaNnIBaL64)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 1:15pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/old-muscle-cars-vs-new-ones/173465/41 "2005-04-07T13:15:39Z")

</div>

> [@Cutty](#):
>
> its is valuable…it has the RARE t-tops

150k \> 13k

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 1:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/old-muscle-cars-vs-new-ones/173465/42 "2005-04-07T13:20:49Z")

</div>

> [@Cutty](#):
>
> its is valuable…it has the RARE t-tops

that leak!!!

i didnt say Foxes werent clunky asnd whatever. but they arent boats… im not a fan of old musclecars… never was, prob never will

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 1:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/old-muscle-cars-vs-new-ones/173465/43 "2005-04-07T13:31:47Z")

</div>

> [@HaNnIBaL64](#):
>
> you can barely launch one cause they burn the tires way way too easily… put stickies on it and i bet it would be a good race…

actually, the exhaust was really fucked up and the gearing was all wrong. You would need a lot of work to just get the old 429 to compete with a stock 03 cobra

I would take a 69 mustang mach1 with a 428 over the boss429. my $.02

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HaNnIBaL64](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hannibal64/32/5954_2.png) [@HaNnIBaL64](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HaNnIBaL64)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2005, 9:44pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/old-muscle-cars-vs-new-ones/173465/44 "2005-04-07T21:44:40Z")

</div>

> [@77rednecktruck](#):
>
> actually, the exhaust was really fucked up and the gearing was all wrong. You would need a lot of work to just get the old 429 to compete with a stock 03 cobra
> 
> I would take a 69 mustang mach1 with a 428 over the boss429. my $.02

the later boss 429s were better than the early ones… corrected some things with the cams and what not… forget where i read it but ill find the link… the early ones gave them all bad names

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2005, 5:15am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/old-muscle-cars-vs-new-ones/173465/45 "2005-04-08T05:15:49Z")

</div>

new car \> old car

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/old-muscle-cars-vs-new-ones/173465.md?page=2)