# OMG, I have an Auto, stock KA

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/omg-i-have-an-auto-stock-ka/110437
**Category:** SON240sx Off Topic
**Created:** [October 22, 2007, 7:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/omg-i-have-an-auto-stock-ka/110437 "2007-10-22T07:39:55Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![GetARide](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e495f1/32.png) [@GetARide](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/GetARide)
#### Post date: [October 22, 2007, 8:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/omg-i-have-an-auto-stock-ka/110437/7 "2007-10-22T08:53:22Z")

</div>

> [@Israeli troops enter Lebanon! boo ya JIM!!!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/israeli-troops-enter-lebanon-boo-ya-jim/14442/52):
>
> I see your points, quite valid. You’ve brought up points about the different goals that people have for their cars.
> 
> Now back to my original question - why do 240 owners impose that it should be the same goals for everyone? If one disagrees or has “lesser” goals, why are then treated different? It’s almost touchy and relates to an earlier discussion about “track go-er elitist” mentality (I recall reading a thread about it before, here on SON)".

240 owners don’t impose anything. If your driving an old school car in teh futere, then what comes to mind is, you can’t afford something new or you are a “tuner” (rice/no rice), or you are stuck in the 90’s, “I like 240’s man” (restorer).

My goal is a Slush box turbo next week.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/omg-i-have-an-auto-stock-ka/110437)._
