# One for the Ford guys! **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\ **Created:** [July 11, 2007, 1:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101 "2007-07-11T13:59:35Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 6
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 10:28am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/101 "2007-07-24T10:28:39Z")
> [@clap is being grossly overused...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/clap-is-being-grossly-overused/31509/34): > > what are talking about 77redneck had a sho :bash: :love: that car was the fastest car on the board, hands down. šŸ˜ƒ ---
**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 10:35am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/102 "2007-07-24T10:35:52Z")
who fucking cares! get over it. ---
**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 10:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/103 "2007-07-24T10:55:41Z")
> [@My alternator broke!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/my-alternator-broke/31393/9): > > -so we are not allowed to talk about cars that are faster than our current car > -mustang interior and build quality\>\>\>\>\>\>\>\>\>camaro interior and build quality > -who said a supercharger does not add torque? > -who said pushrods hurt emissions? it helps to own/be around the cars in the discussion, but it doesnt mean you cant talk about them. however, if you are that guy (not refferring to you, necissarily) and make a bold/stupid statement, you gotta expect ppl to call you on it. mustang interior and quality is better, i agree. but to act like its so much better to buy the GT for its far superior quality then build the motor up to have a better overall car than a f-body is sorta ridiculous. by the time you spend the money on a GT to try to run with a LS1, you wont give a shit about that interior bein nicer. youll just be pissed that you just dropped almost 2gā€™s and your not even in the low 13s yet. ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:00am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/104 "2007-07-24T11:00:47Z")
> [@fs. audiobahn box and 2 10 inch american legacy subs](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-audiobahn-box-and-2-10-inch-american-legacy-subs/31400/4): > > it helps to own/be around the cars in the discussion, but it doesnt mean you cant talk about them. however, if you are that guy (not refferring to you, necissarily) and make a bold/stupid statement, you gotta expect ppl to call you on it. > > mustang interior and quality is better, i agree. but to act like its so much better to buy the GT for its far superior quality then build the motor up to have a better overall car than a f-body is sorta ridiculous. by the time you spend the money on a GT to try to run with a LS1, you wont give a shit about that interior bein nicer. youll just be pissed that you just dropped almost 2gā€™s and your not even in the low 13s yet. making bold/rediculous statements is what the interweb is all about. šŸ˜ƒ I agree with the second point to a degree. It is nice to have a fast car, but a nice interior that doesnā€™t rattle is nice also. ---
**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:01am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/105 "2007-07-24T11:01:46Z")
> [@chris beniot and family found dead](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/chris-beniot-and-family-found-dead/31463/74): > > who fucking cares! > > get over it. ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:03am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/106 "2007-07-24T11:03:40Z")
> [@chris beniot and family found dead](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/chris-beniot-and-family-found-dead/31463/74): > > who fucking cares! > > get over it. isnā€™t your post count high enough? Do you really need to quote yourself? If we didnā€™t want to read it the first time, why would we read it again (kinda like how I just did šŸ˜ƒ )? ---
**Author:** ![slowcamaro](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slowcamaro/32/5975_2.png) [@slowcamaro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slowcamaro)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:08am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/107 "2007-07-24T11:08:08Z")
if the mustang doesnā€™t have porno red itā€™s not worth this discussion ---
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/108 "2007-07-24T11:10:56Z")
Wow you are acting like Mustangs have these high quality interiorsā€¦thats a good one. I have yet to be impressed with any mustang that I have been in quality wise. I drove my uncleā€™s 05 GT and thought the interior was pretty cheap. I am not saying f-bodies are great but they are not as bad as people make them out to be. My WS.6 has 30K on it and there are not too many rattles at allā€¦everything is still really tightā€¦still like new. ---
**Author:** ![slowcamaro](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/slowcamaro/32/5975_2.png) [@slowcamaro](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/slowcamaro)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/109 "2007-07-24T11:12:04Z")
> [@Fs: parts and more parts.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-parts-and-more-parts/31291/13): > > Wow you are acting like Mustangs have these high quality interiorsā€¦thats a good one. I have yet to be impressed with any mustang that I have been in quality wise. I drove my uncleā€™s 05 GT and thought the interior was pretty cheap. I am not saying f-bodies are great but they are not as bad as people make them out to be. My WS.6 has 30K on it and there are not too many rattles at allā€¦everything is still really tightā€¦still like new. I did like blueā€™s mach one interior ---
**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:12am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/110 "2007-07-24T11:12:48Z")
> [@Do you give blood?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/do-you-give-blood/31516/12): > > making bold/rediculous statements is what the interweb is all about. šŸ˜ƒ > > I agree with the second point to a degree. It is nice to have a fast car, but a nice interior that doesnā€™t rattle is nice also. ya, your posts entertain me, so even if they are ridiculous, i cant get irritated. :69: trust me, i dont like my interior rattling around and looking like it came from a cereal box, but the car performs well and looks good on the outside, which is why i bought it. if i put more stock in the interior, along with performance, then i dont think the stang or fbody would be the cars id be lookin at. ---
**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:42am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/111 "2007-07-24T11:42:31Z")
i cant believe weā€™re on page 8 of who rides what carā€™s nuts more. they both have plusses and minuses. > [@Motor Trend"](#): > > At the test track, it proved clear that this reborn Mach 1 is far more than period graphics, '60s/'70s-style Magnum 500 wheels, ā€œshakerā€ hood scoop, and semi-gloss-black deck spoiler. Our five-speed-equipped Mach 1 shot to 60 mph in 5.3 sec and cleared the quarter mile in 13.8 sec at 102.5 mph. Thatā€™s all over the 5.2 to 60 and 13.5 at 107.3 posted by the last Camaro SS we testedā€“which cost a good five grand more. If you feel you need a bigger Mustang hammer, the $34,750 SVT Cobra gets to 60 in just 4.7 sec and does the quarter in 12.8 at 113.2 mph. How fast did you say you wanted to spend? [http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupe/112\_0212\_2003\_ford\_mustang\_mach\_1/engine.html](http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupe/112_0212_2003_ford_mustang_mach_1/engine.html) / thread ---
**Author:** ![bics56](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/47e85d/32.png) [@bics56](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bics56)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:53am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/112 "2007-07-24T11:53:14Z")
> [@I not liking Ford too much right now](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-not-liking-ford-too-much-right-now/31459/8): > > I did like blueā€™s mach one interior Yeah I was in it and it was decentā€¦the seats were awesome. I am not saying they are junk but to say they are way better than f-bodies is retarded. I have driven a few 96-05 mustangs and I will say I did like the seats in the Cobra and the Mach one but other than that I wasnt impressed. ---
**Author:** ![77rednecktruck](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/77rednecktruck/32/5966_2.png) [@77rednecktruck](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/77rednecktruck)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/113 "2007-07-24T11:55:05Z")
> [@\*\*\*\*Official: Southgate Meet Thread\*\*\*\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/official-southgate-meet-thread/29171/908): > > Yeah I was in it and it was decentā€¦the seats were awesome. I am not saying they are junk but to say they are way better than f-bodies is retarded. I have driven a few 96-05 mustangs and I will say I did like the seats in the Cobra and the Mach one but other than that I wasnt impressed. they are way better šŸŒ‘ šŸ˜ƒ ---
**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 11:57am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/114 "2007-07-24T11:57:38Z")
> [@clap is being grossly overused...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/clap-is-being-grossly-overused/31509/41): > > i cant believe weā€™re on page 8 of who rides what carā€™s nuts more. they both have plusses and minuses. > > / thread if ur so pissed about it, then quit postin/readin it. i think its a decent thread. if u notice, alot of the mustang ppl gave props to the gm motor and most GM ppl are agreeing the ford is alittle better quality. who knows, by the time the 09 camaro comes out, maybe youll finally be allowed to get one. ---
**Author:** ![Zack01GC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/a183cd/32.png) [@Zack01GC](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Zack01GC)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 12:04pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/115 "2007-07-24T12:04:30Z")
Aside from the hating that was going on before, it basically comes down to this: Personal Preference. I prefer a Mustang, basically because Iā€™m a Ford guy at heart. Other prefer the GM cars, whether it be because of the engine, style, interior, whatever it may be. ā€œBetterā€ in this case is just a case of personal opinion. Faster/Better Looking/Interior Quality isnā€™t. Iā€™d rather have the Mustang, Most of you would rather have the F-Body. Maybe I would prefer modding the poo out of a Mustang to run with an LS1, maybe you guys would prefer just buying a faster car from the factory. If Fords do need a S/C to be fast, so be it. Ford works with FI and smaller displacement, Chevy works with NA and bigger cubes. Different strokes for different folks. ---
**Author:** ![BlkP42E](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/blkp42e/32/5938_2.png) [@BlkP42E](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlkP42E)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 12:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/116 "2007-07-24T12:11:33Z")
> [@T.I. - T.I. Vs T.I.P. \[2007/MP3/V2 (VBR)/(scene)\]](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/t-i-t-i-vs-t-i-p-2007-mp3-v2-vbr-scene/31521/2): > > if ur so pissed about it, then quit postin/readin it. i think its a decent thread. if u notice, alot of the mustang ppl gave props to the gm motor and most GM ppl are agreeing the ford is alittle better quality. who knows, by the time the 09 camaro comes out, maybe youll finally be allowed to get one. because it is an endless pissing match. ---
**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 12:30pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/117 "2007-07-24T12:30:54Z")
not really. Zack, you make a good point, but if u do choose the mustang, why wouldnt you just try to get a Mach or Cobra if you are tryin to run with/ beat LS1s? it just seems like it would make more sense to me. cause it will NOT take only a couple hundred to make a gt hang with an LS1 ---
**Author:** ![Zack01GC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/a183cd/32.png) [@Zack01GC](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Zack01GC)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 12:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/118 "2007-07-24T12:39:23Z")
> [@I not liking Ford too much right now](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/i-not-liking-ford-too-much-right-now/31459/13): > > not really. > > Zack, you make a good point, but if u do choose the mustang, why wouldnt you just try to get a Mach or Cobra if you are tryin to run with/ beat LS1s? it just seems like it would make more sense to me. cause it will NOT take only a couple hundred to make a gt hang with an LS1 Iā€™ve given up on working to have a fast car right now. Iā€™m working to pay for school. Iā€™m going to wait until Iā€™m out, then Iā€™ll be looking for a 2004 SVT Cobra or Fox Body LX 5.0 to build up. So bringing up a GT was stupid on my part, since personally Iā€™m going to try to go big, instead of piddle around with a GT. ---
**Author:** ![BlueZ06](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/5f9b8f/32.png) [@BlueZ06](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlueZ06)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 12:39pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/119 "2007-07-24T12:39:24Z")
> [@MIND FREAK - v busted](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/mind-freak-v-busted/31428/29): > > no jay only ur stock mach 1 could run with a stock ls1 being all ur cars that u say u have dont really exist. hmm, i own all of my shitā€¦ i really dont care if you believe me or not, thats the best compliment you could give me ---
**Author:** ![smokeyburnouts](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/smokeyburnouts/32/5987_2.png) [@smokeyburnouts](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/smokeyburnouts)\ **Post date:** [July 24, 2007, 1:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101/120 "2007-07-24T13:13:40Z")
> [@S13 now SCRAPPED - \*\*update\*\* Bought a Kouki???](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/s13-now-scrapped-update-bought-a-kouki/31489/17): > > Iā€™ve given up on working to have a fast car right now. Iā€™m working to pay for school. Iā€™m going to wait until Iā€™m out, then Iā€™ll be looking for a 2004 SVT Cobra or Fox Body LX 5.0 to build up. So bringing up a GT was stupid on my part, since personally Iā€™m going to try to go big, instead of piddle around with a GT. ya, i agree with that thinking. nothing wrong with that. [Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101.md?page=5) [Next page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/one-for-the-ford-guys/191101.md?page=7)