# oo'  EEEEEEEEEMR2 spyder...

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259>\
**Category:** Builds\
**Created:** [May 24, 2010, 8:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259 "2010-05-24T20:08:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DRock518](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/drock518/32/6363_2.png) [@DRock518](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/DRock518)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 10:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/61 "2010-11-04T10:24:05Z")

</div>

Turbo k20:excited

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kramerbuccs24](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kramerbuccs24/32/6397_2.png) [@kramerbuccs24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/kramerbuccs24)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 10:28am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/62 "2010-11-04T10:28:07Z")

</div>

> [@Who drives the charger with the plate...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/who-drives-the-charger-with-the-plate/36865/122):
>
> Turbo k20:excited

Dumb in my opinion, with such a short wheelbase it would end up being a pure drag car. If you’re looking to go 10s in an MR2/MRS you have the wrong platform in my opinion. That’s what DSMs/Hondas are for lol. The whole point of going “K” (again, in my opinion) is to have 250whp+ N/A. If you’re looking for ~600whp or something with boost might as well stay in the ZZ family and build that motor for boost.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ReDevil](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redevil/32/6385_2.png) [@ReDevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/ReDevil)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 11:20am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/63 "2010-11-04T11:20:49Z")

</div>

Shut up and drift. The lot of you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HANSTECH](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hanstech/32/6445_2.png) [@HANSTECH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HANSTECH)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 11:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/64 "2010-11-04T11:22:30Z")

</div>

> [@How not to put racing stripes on.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/how-not-to-put-racing-stripes-on/36900/6):
>
> The whole point of going “K” (again, in my opinion) is to have 250whp+ N/A.

thats what im talking bout! i would love to go ITB’s but im not sure how much more of a pain in the ass that would. if its not to bad it will be considered.

i have been watching some posts over at spyderchat and there are some guys who know this platform well and they say its not to terrible to swap. one guy in chi town said he could have it swapped over in like a week. again its the interwebs but hes well respected on the form so i doubt he’s a liar. i thinks its mostly the wiring that is a pain to deal with, the motor fits very nice not a lot of messing around with that.

The k20 is a lot better than the 1zz i have, so trying to boost or build it up wont be to practical either, at least with the k20 its reliable and has way more support in the performance world. 2zz motors are on par with the k20 but harder to come by.

Another reason for me to go k20 is there are a lot of local people with honda tunning experience. this will be legit if it gets built. but N/A all the way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kramerbuccs24](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kramerbuccs24/32/6397_2.png) [@kramerbuccs24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/kramerbuccs24)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2010, 5:17pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/65 "2010-11-04T17:17:08Z")

</div>

You don’t even need ITBs, a good IM like the Xcessive is good for 270whp or even a little more with e85

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HANSTECH](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hanstech/32/6445_2.png) [@HANSTECH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HANSTECH)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 6:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/66 "2010-11-05T06:50:39Z")

</div>

you think an E85 tune would be worth it going N/A? ITB’s would be more of a excess want then practical! lol. plus it would be sound sex all the time!!!

on my way to work this morning i decided that i hate the shitty little motor they put in my mr2. its so under powered. at 65-70mph in 5th its sounds like the motor is about to blow up, tach is @4g’s. needs more power and a 6th gear! aka k20!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kramerbuccs24](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kramerbuccs24/32/6397_2.png) [@kramerbuccs24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/kramerbuccs24)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 6:55am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/67 "2010-11-05T06:55:55Z")

</div>

Yeah I don’t know what Toyota was thinking making the MR-S so slow, back in it’s day the MR2 SC was pretty quick (faster than an e30 M3 0-60 (and maybe in the quarter mile??) and faster than an F40 0-30 if I’m not mistaken), the MR-S is barely faster than an MR2 SC :rofl :rofl

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Murrdog9000](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/murrdog9000/32/6391_2.png) [@Murrdog9000](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Murrdog9000)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 7:38am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/68 "2010-11-05T07:38:22Z")

</div>

> [@4:20](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/4-20/30408/206):
>
> I’m not touching the motor of my MR2 until I can put a K series in there. That will most likely not be within this decade, but it will happen eventually. I think a high revving N/A 4 cyl is the only motor for an mr2/mrs/exige. In a perfect world I’d like a 3S-GE BEAMS swap (or in a double-perfect world, a Formula Atlantic 4A-GE), but in all reality I think a K series is ideal.
> 
> Sooo… my personal suggestion will be yes, go for a K series, just realize that it will in NO way be the most economical way to get 200-280whp in your car. Unless there is some kind of bolt/weld-in kit for the MR-S that I don’t know about haha.

I am getting the k series community to rally around me in stopping you from ever touching a k20 or k24

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kramerbuccs24](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/kramerbuccs24/32/6397_2.png) [@kramerbuccs24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/kramerbuccs24)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 7:43am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/69 "2010-11-05T07:43:49Z")

</div>

Everyone currently in the K series community will be dead by the time this happens so your efforts will be futile.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HANSTECH](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/hanstech/32/6445_2.png) [@HANSTECH](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/HANSTECH)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2010, 7:46am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259/70 "2010-11-05T07:46:42Z")

</div>

> [@anyone know these punkS](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/anyone-know-these-punks/36901/31):
>
> Yeah I don’t know what Toyota was thinking making the MR-S so slow, back in it’s day the MR2 SC was pretty quick (faster than an e30 M3 0-60 (and maybe in the quarter mile??) and faster than an F40 0-30 if I’m not mistaken), the MR-S is barely faster than an MR2 SC :rofl :rofl

dude im pretty sure you would take me in your SC.

if i did go FI i would have to go supercharged. it would be like a bodied atom! lol.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/oo-eeeeeeeeemr2-spyder/252259.md?page=3)
