# petition to ban pitman thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\ **Created:** [April 12, 2013, 6:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/petition-to-ban-pitman-thread/266768 "2013-04-12T18:18:05Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 33
**Author:** ![n\_cole](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/n_cole/32/6382_2.png) [@n\_cole](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/n_cole)\ **Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 3:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/petition-to-ban-pitman-thread/266768/33 "2013-04-22T15:05:54Z")
> [@NYSpeed / OSYN Track Days 2008 \[Next Day: Sept 13th\] \*NEW: Track Timing System!\*](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/nyspeed-osyn-track-days-2008-next-day-sept-13th-new-track-timing-system/44963/464): > > If that infraction came from “Shift 518 Moderation”… instead of a username. how would that have changed this outcome today? Are you saying Adam should or shouldn’t have sent it from his personal username? I think it’s a tough call with a lot of mods that I’ve see in the past on this site as to what may be the final line that gets crossed, and it’s really not easy when some of us know the mods/admin/other members personally vs. people who might not at all (or as well) and don’t have that knowledge about them. Some of us just know which buttons to push with who, and what to leave alone with others. Exactly what happened on this forum today is a great example of that. It’s hard to gauge what someone’s true intention or tone is through text, and that goes for both parties involved here. Getting the entire forum’s input on a quoted post or a PM isn’t going to solve anything, but then this wouldn’t be Shift518 - and what fun would that be? And that’s all I have to say… about that. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/petition-to-ban-pitman-thread/266768)._