# PIMP!

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/pimp/245514
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic
**Created:** [July 18, 2009, 12:26pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/pimp/245514 "2009-07-18T12:26:41Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Boxersix](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/boxersix/32/6327_2.png) [@Boxersix](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Boxersix)
#### Post date: [July 25, 2009, 10:05am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/pimp/245514/15 "2009-07-25T10:05:24Z")

</div>

> [@Automobili Lamborghini!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/automobili-lamborghini/20865/21):
>
> Some of the LSAs were around 4XX-5XX load capacity? I didn’t think another 100LBS would be an issue. I doubt that includes fuel. blah.

OK, I’ll retract the won’t and say that there may be an LSA out there with a 500+lb cap, but it’s going to be a puddle jumper at best and likely have minimal fuel capacity/range…and all this is a huge stretch. Example would be Cessnas new Skylane(182) and that just breaks the 600lb mark but is far from LSA at ~3100lbs gross. Just remember LSA = 1320lbs gross max, including all fuel, plane weight, and total load. I just checked off the Cessna HP for the 162, useable fuel load is 346lbs.

Realistically buying a plane for traveling with family, invest in bigger options or you’ll just end up dissapointed(or worse) Don’t want you to end up like Aaliyah :eek:eek

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/pimp/245514)._
