# Plasma vs LCD

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/plasma-vs-lcd/53081>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [August 11, 2008, 5:57pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/plasma-vs-lcd/53081 "2008-08-11T17:57:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![2gGst69](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/2/f17d59/32.png) [@2gGst69](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/2gGst69)\
**Post date:** [August 11, 2008, 7:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/plasma-vs-lcd/53081/18 "2008-08-11T19:33:48Z")

</div>

I know glare is a big factor, but the Panasonic plasma I have has anti-glare, and anti-reflection technology. Along with pixel shift, and other numerous burn in protection features. I’d imagine most of the lower-end brands (RCA, SHARP, MEMOREX, VIZIO, etc.) don’t have these features. Most Samsungs, Sonys and LG’s all have 'em.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/plasma-vs-lcd/53081)._