# Please Help Me!!! **URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/please-help-me/199336 **Category:** PittSpeed Automotive **Created:** [August 31, 2008, 7:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/please-help-me/199336 "2008-08-31T19:07:41Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 27
### Author: ![Hycomp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Hycomp](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Hycomp) #### Post date: [September 3, 2008, 10:34am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/please-help-me/199336/27 "2008-09-03T10:34:29Z")
Here’s an issue that I don’t think was addressed, did you do something odd with the solenoid associated with the secondaries on the stock GSR intake manifold that your new AEBS mani does not have? > [@Anyone here?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/anyone-here/37637/21): > > Not completely no Steve… I was referring to the fact that combining a huge IM and TB on a stock motor…specifically exhaust…overwhelms the scavenging effect inside the cylinder. Increasing the air coming in, without increasing the ability to evacuate the cylinder does nothing useful. Moreover the stock ECU can only compensate fuel/ignition trims to a limited extent. Go outside those narrow ranges and problems occur. Not being a dick, but trying to get moe people to think on thier own. [http://www.team-integra.net/sections/articles/showArticle.asp?ArticleID=4](http://www.team-integra.net/sections/articles/showArticle.asp?ArticleID=4) Packaging is key, not lego building. Agreed about going huge not helping power but it generally it is not going to make it run noticably rich, especially not super rich as he claims its running. Also, unless the AEBS mani is a good bit different than the last one I saw (I admit it has been a while), the AEBS is very similar to a stock R intake and the 65mm TB isn’t really anything huge either. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/please-help-me/199336)._