# Poke cossey (split)
**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic
**Created:** [October 17, 2007, 2:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011 "2007-10-17T14:16:13Z")
**Posts on this page:** 17
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@4ADAM12](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/4ADAM12)
#### Post date: [October 17, 2007, 2:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/1 "2007-10-17T14:16:13Z")
Camry with a hood scoop, fuckin skanks.
LOL
---
### Author:  [@bennyfizzle](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bennyfizzle)
#### Post date: [October 24, 2007, 8:11pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/2 "2007-10-24T20:11:49Z")
What would be considered a normal amount of times in a day to fap?
---
### Author:  [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)
#### Post date: [October 25, 2007, 7:22pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/3 "2007-10-25T19:22:37Z")
> [@Akira](#):
>
> Dear Cossums,
> I’m considering forced induction for my Spec V. There are both turbo and supercharger options for my car, and I have reached an impass. What would you suggest? While a turbo is nice for high end power, I really don’t feel like dealing with lag, and comparable psi between turbo and supercharger, the supercharger produces more hp. However, I’d have to deal with parastic loss due with the SC, even though the power would be there from the get go. What’s your opinion based on this?
>
> ```
> Love,
> Your Friendly Neighborhood Akira
>
> ```
How is the supercharger making more power than a more efficient turbo and the “parasitic loss”?
---
### Author:  [@Akira](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Akira)
#### Post date: [October 25, 2007, 10:38pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/4 "2007-10-25T22:38:55Z")
Well… at 5 psi and with intake/ exhaust combo the SC makes 303 whp, while a turbocharger kit only makes about 90 more whp then stock. The SC makes more hp.
---
### Author:  [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)
#### Post date: [October 25, 2007, 10:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/5 "2007-10-25T22:40:48Z")
> [@Akira](#):
>
> Well… at 5 psi and with intake/ exhaust combo the SC makes 303 whp, while a turbocharger kit only makes about 90 more whp then stock. The SC makes more hp.
So, the supercharger comes with intake/exhaust and the turbo kit does not. Same boost pressure for both?
---
### Author:  [@Akira](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Akira)
#### Post date: [October 26, 2007, 7:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/6 "2007-10-26T07:36:35Z")
Doesn’t come with exhaust/ intake. Just go to [revolutionautoworks.com](http://revolutionautoworks.com)
---
### Author:  [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)
#### Post date: [October 26, 2007, 11:22am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/7 "2007-10-26T11:22:18Z")
> [@Akira](#):
>
> Doesn’t come with exhaust/ intake. Just go to [revolutionautoworks.com](http://revolutionautoworks.com)
So, supercharger and turbocharger and no other mods at the same pressure and the supercharger makes more power? That’s weird.
---
### Author:  [@bennyfizzle](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bennyfizzle)
#### Post date: [October 26, 2007, 11:28am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/8 "2007-10-26T11:28:15Z")
:bs
---
### Author:  [@Akira](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Akira)
#### Post date: [October 30, 2007, 10:13pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/9 "2007-10-30T22:13:03Z")
Obviously it’s not BS if you went to the site…
---
### Author:  [@bennyfizzle](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/bennyfizzle)
#### Post date: [October 31, 2007, 5:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/10 "2007-10-31T05:13:58Z")
i’m saying nearly 100% of the time a well set up turbo system will flow more/be more efficient than a similarly set up supercharger system.
---
### Author:  [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)
#### Post date: [October 31, 2007, 8:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/11 "2007-10-31T08:19:31Z")
> [@Akira](#):
>
> Obviously it’s not BS if you went to the site…
If it’s on the Internet, then it must be true. 🙂
---
### Author:  [@4ADAM12](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/4ADAM12)
#### Post date: [November 16, 2007, 2:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/12 "2007-11-16T02:13:10Z")
I did pretty good in forza2, considering I never play it.
---
### Author:  [@system](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/system)
#### Post date: [December 6, 2007, 12:43pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/13 "2007-12-06T12:43:35Z")
O most powerfull Cossey why did you hit the board at Old Chicago with the Mini Bowling Ball :stfu
---
### Author:  [@JClark](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JClark)
#### Post date: [January 5, 2008, 4:12pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/14 "2008-01-05T16:12:04Z")
> [@JVG Motorsports](#):
>
> O most powerfull Cossey why did you hit the board at Old Chicago with the Mini Bowling Ball :stfu
LOL! WHAT?!
I miss that place, I think I might drop in for a beer or 7.
---
### Author:  [@stockcarboy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/stockcarboy)
#### Post date: [January 6, 2008, 7:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/15 "2008-01-06T19:23:50Z")
yea that place was cool and i still have a card for there . cossey the mini bowling king pin :haha john sucks j/k
---
### Author:  [@freakLS7](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/freakLS7)
#### Post date: [February 26, 2008, 6:56am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/16 "2008-02-26T06:56:11Z")
oh powerful cossey hows it feel to be back from your little vaca from the site?!?!?
---
### Author:  [@AznJim](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/AznJim)
#### Post date: [March 2, 2008, 10:16pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poke-cossey-split/236011/17 "2008-03-02T22:16:37Z")
I LOVE COSSEY HES MY HERO