# Policing "Forum Sponsors and Advertisers" Section / negativity in general

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/policing-forum-sponsors-and-advertisers-section-negativity-in-general/37342>\
**Category:** Network Information\
**Created:** [October 21, 2007, 4:14pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/policing-forum-sponsors-and-advertisers-section-negativity-in-general/37342 "2007-10-21T16:14:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fry](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/fry/32/7284_2.png) [@Fry](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Fry)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2007, 7:10pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/policing-forum-sponsors-and-advertisers-section-negativity-in-general/37342/15 "2007-10-21T19:10:39Z")

</div>

Similar to how the tech forum requires moderator review to start a new thread… I don’t know how the software works, but perhaps any new post not made by an advertiser would require moderator review.

The only catch is that there would have to be a public statement specifying that the moderators are checking for relavence only, to avoid drama to the tune of “oh well he blocked the post because he’s better friends with the other guys.”

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/policing-forum-sponsors-and-advertisers-section-negativity-in-general/37342)._
