# poor f/body

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poor-f-body/262506>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [January 30, 2012, 4:42am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poor-f-body/262506 "2012-01-30T04:42:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SSmokinn\_SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@SSmokinn\_SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SSmokinn_SS)\
**Post date:** [January 30, 2012, 3:52pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poor-f-body/262506/15 "2012-01-30T15:52:58Z")

</div>

> [@local 600+hp built evo?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/local-600-hp-built-evo/48120/6):
>
> Thats odd from what I remember when Frank owned it he had a 150 or a 175 wet shot on it. Either or doesn’t really matter, from what I remember when he ran a compression check on it about a year before he sold it all cylinders were at the top end of the GM tolerance with very little deviation between them. I thought this car also had upgraded springs to match the cam, but I could be wrong.

it does have springs. That is expected most the time for cam swaps. Like I said, the current owner only runs a 75 through it. Never said anything about previous owners.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/poor-f-body/262506)._
