# Possible to build a 400whp sr that spools by 2000-3000rpm? **URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/possible-to-build-a-400whp-sr-that-spools-by-2000-3000rpm/107276 **Category:** SON240sx Automotive **Created:** [June 30, 2007, 7:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/possible-to-build-a-400whp-sr-that-spools-by-2000-3000rpm/107276 "2007-06-30T07:19:10Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 72
### Author: ![BAS](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bas/32/5540_2.png) [@BAS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BAS) #### Post date: [August 5, 2007, 10:44am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/possible-to-build-a-400whp-sr-that-spools-by-2000-3000rpm/107276/72 "2007-08-05T10:44:36Z")
not that it matters anymore, but how did you plan keep road adheason with 300ft/lb at 2000rpm? to what purpose would all that torque be used down that low o the street? you planning to pull a 35ft boat anytime soon and just don’t feel like down shifting? as for the 2nd paragraph… it’s capt. obvious time, that’s how ALL low volume engines make power, even a V12 2.3L needs to rev to 5500 to start making power, it’s called physics. That last paragraph took me off the fence with you… our an idiot. Go buy a camaro. > [@There's a million reasons why I want a g/f. And just two reasons why I don't...](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/theres-a-million-reasons-why-i-want-a-g-f-and-just-two-reasons-why-i-dont/13554/26): > > By the way 300ft/lbs tq is possible by 2000-3000 on a kat, it’s been done, but… I am just going to opt for an LS1 swap. > > SR is garbage. Period. No torque, unless you want to go ten million revs a minute. It’s just super super PSHHHT CRSHHH VROOOOM loud and powerless. Makes guys like mark have hardons but pretty much most stock sports cars of today (quietly) can make that power and more. > > Anyways, /close thread --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/possible-to-build-a-400whp-sr-that-spools-by-2000-3000rpm/107276)._