# post your latest purchase

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/post-your-latest-purchase/195074>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [January 27, 2008, 8:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/post-your-latest-purchase/195074 "2008-01-27T20:21:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 631

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jeff95TA](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jeff95ta/32/5935_2.png) [@Jeff95TA](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Jeff95TA)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2008, 5:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/post-your-latest-purchase/195074/631 "2008-06-18T05:39:37Z")

</div>

> [@Ok, there is plenty of IT people here... get in and vent](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ok-there-is-plenty-of-it-people-here-get-in-and-vent/36866/29):
>
> this is true, but it does provide faster disk access. I would never think to use raid 0 by itself for anything, but some people are obsessed with speed.

Our analysis computer at work is setup with raid 0. I also have a backup drive where I have all the files backed up (I back up working files probably four times a day). Is there any reason to change from raid 0? I frequently create a results file \>3GB - would the access speed help with this?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/post-your-latest-purchase/195074)._