# post your latest purchase

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/post-your-latest-purchase/195074>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [January 27, 2008, 8:21pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/post-your-latest-purchase/195074 "2008-01-27T20:21:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 636

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![whitey](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/whitey/32/5911_2.png) [@whitey](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/whitey)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2008, 6:32am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/post-your-latest-purchase/195074/636 "2008-06-18T06:32:45Z")

</div>

> [@Need Opinion on Wheels.....Might need Photoshop Help](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/need-opinion-on-wheels-might-need-photoshop-help/36848/10):
>
> I have done work on raid 0 servers and also on raid 1 and 5 servers. The performance is better on raid 0, but not worth the risk of losing everything if any one of the drives fails. If you truly could care less what is on it and can get everything back and tolerate the downtime, go for it.
> 
> I would not put raid 0 on anything, it’s not worth the risk.

I am with you on that one, RAID 0 blows… But I guess a RAID 1+0 would be a little excessive for a home machine to get the same performance and redundancy.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/post-your-latest-purchase/195074)._