# progress thread: 94gt5.0 **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\ **Created:** [November 5, 2009, 12:41pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/progress-thread-94gt5-0/248135 "2009-11-05T12:41:10Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 505
**Author:** ![deadbeatrec](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/deadbeatrec/32/6401_2.png) [@deadbeatrec](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/deadbeatrec)\ **Post date:** [March 10, 2010, 7:40am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/progress-thread-94gt5-0/248135/505 "2010-03-10T07:40:04Z")
> [@WTB: Rear civic seats](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/wtb-rear-civic-seats/29920/8): > > ive always disagreed with that statement, maybe just cuz im a short fuck with midget arms but i dont think its true. > > Just because your arms are longer doesnt necesarily mean you will have a harder time benching. I think it does mean, however, your muscles are more of an elongated muscle. Instead of building out, you actually have more of a chance to build a more proportional muscle. Therefore why are you disadvantaged in benching? Im not arguing with you, im just wondering the real facts behind that statement. People say it all the time. pauly = hairy bench monter /thread --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/progress-thread-94gt5-0/248135)._