# pulley without dampener

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/pulley-without-dampener/20537>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [November 22, 2006, 2:47pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/pulley-without-dampener/20537 "2006-11-22T14:47:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![redrum](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/redrum/32/7398_2.png) [@redrum](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/redrum)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2006, 4:48pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/pulley-without-dampener/20537/10 "2006-11-25T16:48:46Z")

</div>

I have not personally seen any…

It would be hard to find conclusive evidence of increased bearing failure at x rate faster than stock unless a test were done on two or more idential motors in a controlled environment with stock and undamped pulleys. There are too many factors in real world driving to be able to pinpoint a specific increased failure rate.

Again, these results would be unique to each model of engine tested, so I would search around on whatever forums are specific to your car. I researched b-series motors, and I found no evidence to convince me not to run one, and plenty of people who have been running them for a quite a long time with no ill effects. Maybe a hyundai v6 will explode in a week without a dampened pulley, but I have no idea.

Their only real benefit is how fast the engine will change rpms, just like a lightened flywheel, which you will find beneficial if you heel-toe downshift/revmatch. If you are looking for the 1hp it will gain you but dont care about how fast your engine changes speed, save your money for real power building mods.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/pulley-without-dampener/20537)._
