# Q or Blackberry

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/q-or-blackberry/15727>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [August 9, 2006, 10:21am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/q-or-blackberry/15727 "2006-08-09T10:21:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Geehee](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/geehee/32/7238_2.png) [@Geehee](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Geehee)\
**Post date:** [August 9, 2006, 3:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/q-or-blackberry/15727/16 "2006-08-09T15:31:59Z")

</div>

> [@JaysGreenLX](#):
>
> Its funny you say that. The guy at Verizon I was talking to yesterday said the Q was a “phone first” phone/PDA.

> [@RuBiCaNT](#):
>
> The XV6700 is a PDA first and a phone second. The Treo (according to “them”) is a phone first and a PDA second. This is even more true (if there is such a thing) with the Q…

rubi is on the right track. i would put the treo as a PDA first. the Q seems to operate “more so” as a phone than a PDA, but in generalities, PDA phones are a lot alike.

and :word: to howie’s comment on the sidekick, coverage aside.

edit: and if you are going to USE the features, then by all means, get a PDA phone. i see too many people that want it just for the look of it and to “look important”. those are the people that also arnt aware of the data feature.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/q-or-blackberry/15727)._