# Question!?!?!?!?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/question/133342>\
**Category:** Canada Nissan Automotive\
**Created:** [April 17, 2007, 8:06pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/question/133342 "2007-04-17T20:06:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 26

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pcproa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/c5a1d2/32.png) [@pcproa](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/pcproa)\
**Post date:** [April 26, 2007, 6:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/question/133342/26 "2007-04-26T18:33:35Z")

</div>

> [@Roller Hockey Wed nights @ Pepsi Center 8-10](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/roller-hockey-wed-nights-pepsi-center-8-10/805/72):
>
> Yeah I think I know who you speak of. You say they have the same power bands but someone else was telling me that they’re different… hhhmmmm… see this is why I want to try things for myself because everyone has different views.

In stock form, the SR makes better low RPM torque but the CA revs higher than the SR.  
Just think RB and you’re gonna get in line with what the CA does. CA revs HIGH but can be a pussy low down.  
SR has 0.2L more for low down torque. Probably not the best factor, but one of them for sure.  
BTW, I am in no way an SR or CA guru. Just mentioning what I’ve heard and what I’ve read in the past.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/question/133342)._