# Rendell FTL **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [February 5, 2007, 1:35pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rendell-ftl/187860 "2007-02-05T13:35:32Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 9
**Author:** ![BlueZ06](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/5f9b8f/32.png) [@BlueZ06](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BlueZ06)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2007, 2:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rendell-ftl/187860/9 "2007-02-05T14:05:31Z")
> [@lady problems.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/lady-problems/27650/176): > > While I don’t agree with what Rendell is doing, you are simply spouting economic theory that one would learn in a simple college level economics class. Just because a 1 or 200 level class SAYS that reducing taxes would spur economic growth, in actuality there are far more issues pertinent to it. So please, don’t just come out with a gross generalization that says “Lower Taxes! If you do, we’ll spend more!” because that is rarely, if ever, solely the case. Actually I’m spoutting off trickle down economics, which is hardly entry level. I’m spoutting laws of ecomoics not theory, take a look back about 20 years or so, and see what happend to the economy after taxes were reduced. You’ll notice nothing but economic growth. Easiest way to create a government surplus is reduce government spending in areas where it’s not needed currently, and reduce taxation. Give me a list of courses you took and what university you attended, and I’ll tell you exactly how knowledgable you are in the realm of economics. Also please state real life experience with economics in a business environment, and how taxation has affected you, your co-workers, your employer, and employees. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rendell-ftl/187860)._