# Reverse Hyperthreading a Myth?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-hyperthreading-a-myth/14358>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [July 10, 2006, 10:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-hyperthreading-a-myth/14358 "2006-07-10T10:19:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RuBiCaNT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rubicant/32/7622_2.png) [@RuBiCaNT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RuBiCaNT)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2006, 10:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-hyperthreading-a-myth/14358/1 "2006-07-10T10:19:40Z")

</div>

[http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32885](http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32885)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clean\_Baldy](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/clean_baldy/32/7308_2.png) [@Clean\_Baldy](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Clean_Baldy)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2006, 11:10am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-hyperthreading-a-myth/14358/2 "2006-07-10T11:10:30Z")

</div>

Where did that guy learn english? LOL

But, interesting if it’s true. I was looking forward to seeing the future of computers heading into the reverse HT era of 20+ cores, all acting together as one…

hmmmm… oh well

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TgDn32](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/tgdn32/32/7360_2.png) [@TgDn32](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TgDn32)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2006, 1:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-hyperthreading-a-myth/14358/3 "2006-07-10T13:36:04Z")

</div>

20 core processors. . . :drool: