# "reverse multi-threading" **URL:** \ **Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [April 18, 2006, 9:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-multi-threading/10979 "2006-04-18T21:34:43Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Bacon](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bacon/32/7230_2.png) [@Bacon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Bacon)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2006, 9:34pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-multi-threading/10979/1 "2006-04-18T21:34:43Z")
[http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/04/18/amd\_reverse\_smt/](http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/04/18/amd_reverse_smt/) An interesting idea that might actaully result in more performance in real-world apps. Question is will it work? EDIT: Shades of 3dfx like woah. Not that it’s a bad thing if it’s done right. ---
**Author:** ![RuBiCaNT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rubicant/32/7622_2.png) [@RuBiCaNT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RuBiCaNT)\ **Post date:** [April 19, 2006, 5:32am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-multi-threading/10979/2 "2006-04-19T05:32:08Z")
Sound cool… Hopefuly they can pull it off. :tup: ---
**Author:** ![Dr.Stevil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/da6949/32.png) [@Dr.Stevil](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Dr.Stevil)\ **Post date:** [April 19, 2006, 9:42am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-multi-threading/10979/3 "2006-04-19T09:42:51Z")
awesome :tup: ---
**Author:** ![RuBiCaNT](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rubicant/32/7622_2.png) [@RuBiCaNT](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RuBiCaNT)\ **Post date:** [April 25, 2006, 11:28am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/reverse-multi-threading/10979/4 "2006-04-25T11:28:51Z")
More on reverse multi-threading [http://www.overclockers.com/tips00954/](http://www.overclockers.com/tips00954/)