# Rothlisfucker deal **URL:** \ **Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\ **Created:** [March 4, 2008, 7:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rothlisfucker-deal/195883 "2008-03-04T07:24:23Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 149
**Author:** ![Hycomp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Hycomp](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Hycomp)\ **Post date:** [March 7, 2008, 2:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rothlisfucker-deal/195883/149 "2008-03-07T14:56:32Z")
> [@Explain HUD houses](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/explain-hud-houses/35309/7): > > If you have a waiting list of 20,000 why wouldnt u want a bigger stadium. so far heinz has been noted for poor kicking conditions, poor playing surface, lack of crowd noise, ugly seats, boring facade (sp?) thats what i mean as far as the way they exucuted it. PNC, while has a terrible product inside, has got nothing but rave reviews about the venue itself. Most NFL stadiums are built undersized to keep demand up as the perception is much better to have a waiting list of 20 thousand for your 65,000 seat stadium than to have empty seats in a 90,000 seat stadium. For instance, the Bills play in a stadium that seats around 74,000 and in the 90’s often times couldn’t fill it. In order to try to fill it they would black out the games locally which obviously wasn’t the greatest for local TV revenue. A full stadium always looks better on TV and will generate better revenues than a large partially empty venue. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rothlisfucker-deal/195883)._