# RSX-S vs New Si vs Accord V6

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive
**Created:** [March 7, 2006, 12:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003 "2006-03-07T12:58:31Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MaximaSE98](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/maximase98/32/7600_2.png) [@MaximaSE98](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MaximaSE98)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 4:59pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/21 "2006-03-07T16:59:37Z")

</div>

2k2 MAXIMA

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Slomies](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ee7513/32.png) [@Slomies](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Slomies)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 5:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/22 "2006-03-07T17:05:25Z")

</div>

> [@98teg](#):
>
> I voted for the Accord coupe…love the interior

agreed

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![93dx\_hatch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/9/90ced4/32.png) [@93dx\_hatch](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/93dx_hatch)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 6:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/23 "2006-03-07T18:42:22Z")

</div>

> [@MaximaSE98](#):
>
> 2k2 MAXIMA

i think he wants a 2 door,

Honda \> Nissan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MikeRi24](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/57b2e6/32.png) [@MikeRi24](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MikeRi24)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 6:50pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/24 "2006-03-07T18:50:38Z")

</div>

RSX is too small for me, im not a huge fan of civics to begin with (and even though its a Si, its a civic and i think rice when i think civic)

i’ve always LOVED the accord V6s however i like the 98-02 style better than the 04-06 or whatever the newer style is

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![RobtC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/51bf81/32.png) [@RobtC](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/RobtC)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 6:56pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/25 "2006-03-07T18:56:08Z")

</div>

You can buy my 2005 tC for 15K 😃

If not, Accord V6

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JDMR2](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jdmr2/32/7587_2.png) [@JDMR2](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JDMR2)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 7:57pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/26 "2006-03-07T19:57:06Z")

</div>

> [@brendansi](#):
>
> Stupid if you ask me, BUT if you can find one at sticker, that would be my vote.

[http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1,1&item=4618987583&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT](http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1,1&item=4618987583&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT)

under 21K with the navi with only 1K miles on it…looks like a good deal…but i don’t think i want to spend that much…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JDMR2](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jdmr2/32/7587_2.png) [@JDMR2](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JDMR2)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 8:08pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/27 "2006-03-07T20:08:58Z")

</div>

[http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.jsp?car\_id=192873953&dealer\_id=774983&car\_year=2004&search\_type=both&make=HONDA&distance=300&model=ACCORD&sponsorModel=%2Fredirect%2Fredirector\_link.jsp%3Fto\_url%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fad.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B15221680%3B11086139%3Bx%3Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fautomobiles.honda.com%2Ftools%2Fwindowmanager.asp%3FFunction%3Dbuild\_and\_price%26mis%3DFNSFBDMGEH625&address=14150&certified=&advanced=&max\_price=15000&bkms=1141790495638&min\_price=500&end\_year=2006&start\_year=2004&isp=y&lang=en&cardist=295](http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.jsp?car_id=192873953&dealer_id=774983&car_year=2004&search_type=both&make=HONDA&distance=300&model=ACCORD&sponsorModel=%2Fredirect%2Fredirector_link.jsp%3Fto_url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fad.doubleclick.net%252Fclk%253B15221680%253B11086139%253Bx%253Fhttp%253A%252F%252Fautomobiles.honda.com%252Ftools%252Fwindowmanager.asp%253FFunction%253Dbuild_and_price%26mis%3DFNSFBDMGEH625&address=14150&certified=&advanced=&max_price=15000&bkms=1141790495638&min_price=500&end_year=2006&start_year=2004&isp=y&lang=en&cardist=295)

hottt

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MaximaSE98](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/maximase98/32/7600_2.png) [@MaximaSE98](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/MaximaSE98)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/28 "2006-03-07T20:09:54Z")

</div>

> [@93dx--hatch](#):
>
> i think he wants a 2 door,
> 
> Honda \> Nissan

not in my book

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Zong](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/zong/32/7580_2.png) [@Zong](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Zong)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 8:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/29 "2006-03-07T20:46:22Z")

</div>

2006 Si’s handle very well on paper, interior is a bit tacky but I saw one in person today; exterior makes for a beautiful car. RSX-S should be a close 2nd if not tie for 1st but you’ll find yourself fitting higher spring rates or swapping suspension due to understeer and excessive body roll.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JDMR2](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jdmr2/32/7587_2.png) [@JDMR2](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JDMR2)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 9:07pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/30 "2006-03-07T21:07:52Z")

</div>

> [@azndc5er](#):
>
> 2006 Si’s handle very well on paper, interior is a bit tacky but I saw one in person today; exterior makes for a beautiful car. RSX-S should be a close 2nd if not tie for 1st but you’ll find yourself fitting higher spring rates or swapping suspension due to understeer and excessive body roll.

lol

read first post…DD biaaaa, im not looking to get something to mod the shit out of it…i want comfort + good gas mileage + some pimp factor…lol…

i should really just stick to my roots and get a used rex…but you KNOW the day i bought the car, i’d already have an up-pipe, down pipe, header, and exhaust ready for bolt on with full suspension coming the next week…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bacon](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/bacon/32/7230_2.png) [@Bacon](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Bacon)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 9:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/31 "2006-03-07T21:23:33Z")

</div>

Accord V6, great interior. Good power, makes for a very nice DD.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![intense98rt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/77aa72/32.png) [@intense98rt](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/intense98rt)
#### Post date: [March 7, 2006, 9:46pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/32 "2006-03-07T21:46:09Z")

</div>

my vote is for the rsx-s… i think the new civics are ugly. the accords are nice, but i dont see it having too high of a “pimp factor”. the rsx-s is a pretty fun car to drive  
go test drive them all and see what you like best

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Zong](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/zong/32/7580_2.png) [@Zong](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Zong)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2006, 6:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/33 "2006-03-08T06:19:59Z")

</div>

> [@JDMR2](#):
>
> lol
> 
> read first post…DD biaaaa

A DD should still perform. My point was that on paper, Si will outhandle RSX stock to stock. Test drive both and see which feels tighter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sureshot007](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/sureshot007/32/7345_2.png) [@sureshot007](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/sureshot007)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2006, 6:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/34 "2006-03-08T06:39:09Z")

</div>

It’s all about the accord. It’s not small and cramped like the civic or rsx can be (depending on your size). I have not been impressed with the RSX performance, and I haven’t found a new Si to test drive yet. However, you can’t argue with the performance of the v6, and like Howie said, the hybrid kicks ass. It is a very well put together car.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![\_Karu](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/_karu/32/7602_2.png) [@\_Karu](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/_Karu)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2006, 7:00am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/35 "2006-03-08T07:00:13Z")

</div>

i picked “other” instead. I think 2007 Civic SI Sedan will be the best pick!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cooter](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/cooter/32/7199_2.png) [@cooter](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/cooter)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2006, 7:46am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/36 "2006-03-08T07:46:48Z")

</div>

> [@Deuce](#):
>
> i really liked the 4 door si concept that someone posted, i believe that is scheduled to be released in 2007 maybe?? anyone know about this?

i posted that up…i was at john holtz honda this weekend with my dad buying his new car and they said that the Si sedan should be available this fall…As for price they didnt have one yet…

Focusinprogress…the 06 Si interior is pretty damn sharp…i dont know why you dont like it??? :gotme:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![SubaruDan](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/subarudan/32/7195_2.png) [@SubaruDan](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SubaruDan)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2006, 7:18pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/37 "2006-03-08T19:18:26Z")

</div>

accords are more expensive than a rsx-s? where have I been.

RSX 4TW

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![woody](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/woody/32/7191_2.png) [@woody](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/woody)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2006, 7:31pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/38 "2006-03-08T19:31:33Z")

</div>

i’d take a new SI over the rsx

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![rskrause](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/rskrause/32/7367_2.png) [@rskrause](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/rskrause)
#### Post date: [March 9, 2006, 7:31am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/39 "2006-03-09T07:31:55Z")

</div>

Well, all nice cars but seriously torque challenged. That why I picked the Accord. But did they come with a manny tranny? If not, I’d go for the RSX.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sureshot007](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/sureshot007/32/7345_2.png) [@sureshot007](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/sureshot007)
#### Post date: [March 9, 2006, 7:36am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003/40 "2006-03-09T07:36:43Z")

</div>

Th V6 came with a 6speed manual option - which is what I would recommend.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/rsx-s-vs-new-si-vs-accord-v6/9003.md?page=1)
