# "SAFE" Act arrest in New Lebanon **URL:** \ **Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\ **Created:** [May 13, 2013, 11:50am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/safe-act-arrest-in-new-lebanon/267007 "2013-05-13T11:50:20Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 13
**Author:** ![Vovchandr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vovchandr/32/6275_2.png) [@Vovchandr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Vovchandr)\ **Post date:** [May 13, 2013, 2:51pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/safe-act-arrest-in-new-lebanon/267007/13 "2013-05-13T14:51:42Z")
> [@Why do you have people making stupid faces in your avatar? Who are they?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/why-do-you-have-people-making-stupid-faces-in-your-avatar-who-are-they/52720/8): > > pretty much what i was saying, although i think that there is a bit of a difference. IMO no responsible gun owner would have a firearm sitting on the passenger seat of their vehicle, unless it was in a case…sadly most responsible gun owners have been lazy in the past and its coming back to haunt them now, such as selling to a complete stranger without getting a background check or even ID. although they werent required a year ago, if I owned a gun and were to sell it, unless i knew the person i would make them submit to a background check so i know that they are not a criminal. this is where i am torn between supporting and opposing universal background checks, i believe there are a lot of idiots who should not own guns, but as history has shown a universal background check=registry and anytime a registry has been established it leads to confiscation…however privately conducted background checks (almost like a pre-employment check) could be a possible solution. > > /kk post There is a universal background check for pistol owners in New York and a registry. Are you implying that there is going to be a pistol confiscation? --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/safe-act-arrest-in-new-lebanon/267007)._