# Shelby F-150 SuperSnake Concept

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/shelby-f-150-supersnake-concept/204117>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic\
**Created:** [November 5, 2009, 4:40pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/shelby-f-150-supersnake-concept/204117 "2009-11-05T16:40:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quik](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/quik/32/5979_2.png) [@Quik](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Quik)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2009, 1:05pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/shelby-f-150-supersnake-concept/204117/21 "2009-11-06T13:05:33Z")

</div>

> [@Any one work for time warner?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/any-one-work-for-time-warner/41467/17):
>
> Why do people feel the need to talk about the lightning like it was some sort of supercar (truck). It was an expensive model of a fucking ugly brick, solely because of a motor you could build for infinitely cheaper. I don’t get it.

the 2nd gen lightning was more then just a motor. It was basically a 3/4 ton truck as for strenght wise. It was a very respectable truck of its time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sinner6.0L](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/sinner6.0l/32/6016_2.png) [@Sinner6.0L](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Sinner6.0L)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2009, 3:02pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/shelby-f-150-supersnake-concept/204117/22 "2009-11-06T15:02:38Z")

</div>

i love the 2nd gen lightnings. i’m still up in the air about looking for one because i’d have to do a little towing with it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kyle\_H](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/97f17d/32.png) [@Kyle\_H](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Kyle_H)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2009, 7:10pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/shelby-f-150-supersnake-concept/204117/23 "2009-11-06T19:10:47Z")

</div>

That looks great. I love the SVT Raptors too. If they werent 40-50k fucking dollars Id consider one. Ridiculous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SixSpeed454SS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e19adc/32.png) [@SixSpeed454SS](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/SixSpeed454SS)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2009, 6:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/shelby-f-150-supersnake-concept/204117/24 "2009-11-07T06:17:14Z")

</div>

I hate to say it, but I gotta agree with Quik on this.

That’s not a bad looking truck, but it’s performance will be shit. If they built it with a 640 or 725 hp motor, how much do you think they will charge for it? Probably $80K or more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Swarzkopf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7feea3/32.png) [@Swarzkopf](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Swarzkopf)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2009, 9:41am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/shelby-f-150-supersnake-concept/204117/25 "2009-11-07T09:41:28Z")

</div>

The Lightning was awesome because it offered good performance and good utility.

This thing looked cool until I saw the scoop in the bed cover. That’s just retarded.

[Previous page](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/shelby-f-150-supersnake-concept/204117.md?page=1)