# Skunk2 Composite Intake Manifold

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/skunk2-composite-intake-manifold/195251>\
**Category:** PittSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [February 4, 2008, 10:19am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/skunk2-composite-intake-manifold/195251 "2008-02-04T10:19:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wrayzor](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/wrayzor/32/6021_2.png) [@wrayzor](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/wrayzor)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2008, 2:14am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/skunk2-composite-intake-manifold/195251/12 "2008-02-07T02:14:24Z")

</div>

> [@who's is this ?????????](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/whos-is-this/34773/6):
>
> i had a hondata gasket and didnt notice any differance in intake temp…if you can pick up a few whp just by dropping fuel temp by keeping it from going threw a hot alum fuel rail whats the downside? i would spend the extra money anyday for a quality product. esp in an all motor build where every hp counts

x2

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/skunk2-composite-intake-manifold/195251)._
