# Smoking Ban injunction

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/smoking-ban-injunction/186965
**Category:** PittSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [December 22, 2006, 1:23pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/smoking-ban-injunction/186965 "2006-12-22T13:23:29Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 48

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JackdUp](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/jackdup/32/6015_2.png) [@JackdUp](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/JackdUp)
#### Post date: [December 28, 2006, 5:29am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/smoking-ban-injunction/186965/48 "2006-12-28T05:29:52Z")

</div>

> [@On another topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/26897/3):
>
> …I bet if the gov were to introduce a ban on every car capable of going faster than 65mph or limit it’s speed to 65mph…

I’d find a way around it, just like all of you.

> [@FS/FT: 1993 Del sol turbo](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-ft-1993-del-sol-turbo/25332/53):
>
> …That attitude is what got us a bankrupt social security system and a 2-party political system.

Jon, think about the following statement for a minute:

> [@new whip.](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/new-whip/26889/15):
>
> …when what you do can affect other people in a negative way, then there needs to be rules ( **JackdUp** : _I’d rather have the words “common sense” placed here instead of rules, but it’s the same kind of thing?_) to avoid that.

Actually, Libertarian beliefs are sort of along these lines: If you do something and it doesn’t affect someone else, then enjoy/do it. Otherwise, repect the other people and don’t do it/don’t do it around them.

Bics, you’re not that far off of what Libertarians believe, you just think that regulations are the answer where Libertarians believe common sense and respect for fellow man is/are the answer(s).

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/smoking-ban-injunction/186965)._
