# solid aluminum subframe bushings vs polyurethane?

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/solid-aluminum-subframe-bushings-vs-polyurethane/109504>\
**Category:** SON240sx Automotive\
**Created:** [September 16, 2007, 9:48pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/solid-aluminum-subframe-bushings-vs-polyurethane/109504 "2007-09-16T21:48:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sidewayz240](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e99b99/32.png) [@sidewayz240](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/sidewayz240)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2007, 2:09pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/solid-aluminum-subframe-bushings-vs-polyurethane/109504/18 "2007-09-18T14:09:48Z")

</div>

> [@Monthly Text Msg Count?!](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/monthly-text-msg-count/14099/14):
>
> i heard energy suspension is bad.
> 
> some of the busings fucked up or something
> 
> read this on zilvia
> 
> just had a quick glance, i could be totally wrong.

The only bad thing i have heard about energy suspension is their T/C rod bushing. It used to be a one piece and did not allow any flex or deflection causing the bending of the tension rod brackets. This was corrected by making these bushings 3 piece.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/solid-aluminum-subframe-bushings-vs-polyurethane/109504)._