# Some pics with the new camera

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/some-pics-with-the-new-camera/246557>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [September 3, 2009, 7:37pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/some-pics-with-the-new-camera/246557 "2009-09-03T19:37:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vovchandr](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/vovchandr/32/6275_2.png) [@Vovchandr](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Vovchandr)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2009, 4:36pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/some-pics-with-the-new-camera/246557/17 "2009-09-08T16:36:23Z")

</div>

> [@this is why staying stock doesnt work](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/this-is-why-staying-stock-doesnt-work/19978/69):
>
> No.  
> Although editing can make a shit pic look good, it’s better to have a good pic first, THEN edit. Thus, good original photo is key.

True.

Nearly EVERY photo _should_ be edited, no matter how slight of an adjustment. 99% of good material you see on the web, and 100% of good material you see in magazines has been retouched.

However as it’s been said, remember the rule of GIGO - Garbage in = garbage out.

Oh, upload those pics or ban :tongue

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/some-pics-with-the-new-camera/246557)._