# Son of a Mother F!@#$##!!

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/son-of-a-mother-f/50127
**Category:** NYSpeed Off Topic
**Created:** [June 17, 2008, 6:24am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/son-of-a-mother-f/50127 "2008-06-17T06:24:34Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BuickGN](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/buickgn/32/7200_2.png) [@BuickGN](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/BuickGN)
#### Post date: [June 17, 2008, 8:39am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/son-of-a-mother-f/50127/11 "2008-06-17T08:39:55Z")

</div>

> [@Djs87](#):
>
> I dont see how that can be faster than the raptor anyway. Those things are some of the fastest HDs out there. Despite being smaller in capacity than the 7200rpm drives, they are better. But really, if you need more than 160gb, just pick up a western digital external HD.

sorry man do some reading, the raptors arent the fastest out there anymore, even the velociraptor is cutting it close at sata2, the original raptors are only sata 150 also.

Bigger cache, NCQ, perp. Recording at 7200 rpm=faster than a raptor at 10k rpm

Read here, great article [Samsung Spinpoint F1 HDDs: New Winners? | Tom's Hardware](http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/samsung-overtakes-a-bang,1730.html)

as you can see the raptor isnt that great compared to the newer drives out there.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/son-of-a-mother-f/50127)._