# soon bitches

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/soon-bitches/242645>\
**Category:** Shift518 Off Topic\
**Created:** [March 8, 2009, 6:58pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/soon-bitches/242645 "2009-03-08T18:58:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 52

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![94Gt5.0](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/94gt5.0/32/6377_2.png) [@94Gt5.0](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/94Gt5.0)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2009, 12:19pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/soon-bitches/242645/52 "2009-03-09T12:19:39Z")

</div>

> [@greddy bov problem](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/greddy-bov-problem/15253/7):
>
> The Camaro would cost 10k more if GM put time and effort into it’s interior quality and power plant too. lol. It’s 10k less because it’s got 30 less ponies and more plastic in the interior alone than the G has in the entire car. Not to mention it weighs a little more (I believe the G is like 3,700 or something close to that). Plus the G has so many more bells and whistles compared to the Camaro.

The american muscle cars were NOT built to be luxury cars, or be plush. They were built to be affordable for the working man, and made to be fast, or have the ability to be made fast. Which i would say teh camaro has over the G37 HANDS DOWN(And i hate chevies lol)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/soon-bitches/242645)._
