# SS dyno results...holy shit!

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ss-dyno-results-holy-shit/242757>\
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive\
**Created:** [March 12, 2009, 2:33pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ss-dyno-results-holy-shit/242757 "2009-03-12T14:33:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 230

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shawn96VR-4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eada6e/32.png) [@Shawn96VR-4](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/Shawn96VR-4)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2009, 4:20pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ss-dyno-results-holy-shit/242757/230 "2009-03-14T16:20:53Z")

</div>

> [@TurboTravis"](#):
>
> Absolutely nothing wrong with 12.0 on most boosted applications.

The “rule of thumb” from everything I have read is 11.5. Anything 12.X is considered lean. Sure, you can get away with it but why risk it for min. gains?

> [@FS: Samsung 5.1 surround](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/fs-samsung-5-1-surround/15423/4):
>
> I guess good thing your not a tuner.

Given my car made more power with less displacement on pump, I’d disagree.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ss-dyno-results-holy-shit/242757)._
