# SSC To Challenge Bugatti For New Fastest Production Car?

**URL:** https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ssc-to-challenge-bugatti-for-new-fastest-production-car/253267
**Category:** Shift518 Automotive
**Created:** [July 15, 2010, 8:13am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ssc-to-challenge-bugatti-for-new-fastest-production-car/253267 "2010-07-15T08:13:49Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TurboTravis](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/turbotravis/32/6406_2.png) [@TurboTravis](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/TurboTravis)
#### Post date: [July 16, 2010, 7:42pm UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ssc-to-challenge-bugatti-for-new-fastest-production-car/253267/13 "2010-07-16T19:42:13Z")

</div>

> [@What did this start out as?](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/what-did-this-start-out-as/33524/19):
>
> I wouldn’t go so far as to say it’s an engineering marvel.
> 
> Think of this:
> 
> The Veyron SS (Yes I just said that) uses 8.0L of displacement with quad-turbocharging to get 1200mph and 268mph. In 2010.
> 
> The McLaren F1 used 6.0L of displacement with no turbocharging to get 627hp and 240mph. In what, 1994?
> 
> So the Veyron has 2.0L more, four turbos more, 573hp more, 16 years worth of technology, and only 28mph more. I don’t think that’s as much a marvel as you make it out to be.

1)McLaren was not stock (no rev limiter)  
2)Go talk to someone that has driven the McLaren over 200, and the Veyron over 200. Ask which one left the experience with white underwear.

> [@HAPPY BIRTHDAY MIKE (INN-TUNE)](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/happy-birthday-mike-inn-tune/33530/23):
>
> Got 'EM

Not really. And for the record, I’d take an F1 over the Veyron, but totally respect the Veyrons abilities!

(we saw what happened when one of the worlds fastest GTR’s tried to race a stock Veyron…:tongue)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/ssc-to-challenge-bugatti-for-new-fastest-production-car/253267)._
