# Sti vs. Evo

**URL:** <https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sti-vs-evo/2824>\
**Category:** NYSpeed Automotive\
**Created:** [September 28, 2005, 11:58am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sti-vs-evo/2824 "2005-09-28T11:58:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 126

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![theblue](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forums.speedlife.net/theblue/32/5074_2.png) [@theblue](https://forums.speedlife.net/u/theblue)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2007, 7:17am UTC](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sti-vs-evo/2824/126 "2007-12-22T07:17:07Z")

</div>

> [@sureshot007](#):
>
> I’m partial to the STI. For me, the EVO has too many gadgets that correct your mistakes as a driver. If its going to be a track car, then how are you ever supposed to learn if the car is constantly correcting your bad inputs? To me, the STI’s mentality is, “Here’s gobs of power - do with it what you want.” The EVO is more like, “Oh, wait, you don’t mean to do that, so I will correct a little and keep you going this way.” Sometimes you _want_ the car to do something silly.
> 
> And besides, Mitsubishi may not be around in a few years…

WTF are you talking about… name one of those gadgets?

I thought one think everybody agreed on was that the evo is a much more raw car with a more direct feel (better steering rack etc) and less options.

there are ZERO driving aids.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.speedlife.net/t/sti-vs-evo/2824)._